>> MIM Speaks
HOLISTIC APPROACH TO GOVERNANCE
OCTOBER 5, 2003 -
THE STAR
By MICHAEL J. SEGON
MANY people view corporate governance as a means by which
organisations can ensure their activities do not put at risk a
key feature of business, that of reputation.
Much of the literature addressing corporate governance focuses
on the duties and responsibilities of company directors, members
of company boards and those of the senior executives of
organisations.
This literature also tends to be around the appropriate
financial structures and reporting mechanisms that need to be in
place to ensure good decision-making and to minimise the
occurrence of damaging behaviour such as fraud and corruption.
There can be no doubt as to the need for organisations, and in
particular the senior executives and directors of organisations,
to take these duties and responsibilities seriously. However,
solely financial or accounting based approaches to governance
are a limited and incomplete approach.
Organisations need to recognise that the financial and
legalistic framework of corporate governance is in fact
underpinned by ethics and morality.
Every society codifies minimum moral standards as basic laws. It
is the duty of every citizen to abide by those laws whether they
refer to restrictions of civil liberty for the betterment of the
common good, such as the imposition of speed limits on highways,
or the duty of citizens to pay taxes for the provision of basic
services.
In the case of organisations, they are not a person in the true
sense, yet society has conferred upon them the right to be seen
as a legal person. With this privilege also comes responsibility
to be a good corporate citizen.
Organisations, unlike people, are not conscious entities in the
same way that people are.
Individuals within organisations are, in fact, limited in their
ability to make decisions to only those that advance the
interests of the organisation. This concept is known as agency.
Once employed by an organisation, an individual becomes its
agent and must make decisions consistent with its interests.
Unfortunately, individuals sometimes misunderstand this
important concept and may make decisions that appear to advance
organisational goals in the short term, but undermine its duty
to society by breaking laws or putting individuals in society at
risk through unsafe work practices, products or services.
These decisions – such as reducing costs, increasing profit,
firing workers, cutting safety inspections or obtaining sales or
contracts through corrupt practices – are often made in the
belief that they advance organisational interest. In reality,
these practices jeopardise the very basis of business activity,
that of trust. Trust, in turn, is based on acting with
integrity.
Governance structures primarily address issues associated with
financial reporting and following legal requirements. This can
be seen as the minimum moral duty of any citizen, that is, to
follow the law.
However, simple legal compliance does not necessarily result in
integrity. Organisations need to examine their relationship with
a range of stakeholders in society and to truly act as a good
corporate citizen by contributing to and advancing the common
good.
In addition, it cannot rely on an assumption that all of its
employees or agents will automatically know what is the right
thing to do. Organisations need to devise strategies that
encourage appropriate internal behaviour. These strategies are
most often referred to as organisational ethical systems. A
common feature of such systems is the development of a code of
ethics and code of conduct.
Unfortunately, many organisations make the mistake of assuming
that simply publishing a code of ethics is all that needs to be
done.
Research conducted by the Centre of the Business Ethics at
Bentley College in Massachusetts, along with similar research
conducted in Australia and Europe by various ethics centres,
find that many organisations do not approach the issue of
developing a culture that fosters integrity, to the same extent
as planning marketing and advertising campaigns or expenditures
on new technology.
Moreover, the research shows that many organisations introduce
incomplete ethical systems, often failing to communicate ethical
standards, to train people in ethical decision-making and to
adequately reinforce desired behaviours through appropriate
reward systems.
Such partial strategies are rarely successful and only serve to
raise the cynicism so often found when discussing the issue of
business ethics.
The establishment of a holistic approach to governance needs to
include systems that identify not just legal and financial
reporting requirements but also the ethical duties of
organisations. These must be developed within the organisation
and reinforced through appropriate communication and training
strategies.
A substantial body of research into governance and integrity
systems exists and is available to organisations as an aid in
establishing world’s best practice approaches.
It is the responsibility of managers, and in particular of
senior managers, to be aware of this research and its importance
as a strategy of enhancing organisational reputation.
Educational programmes, in particular business courses such as
the MBA, need to focus on these concepts in the same way that
they address the functional areas of business; that of
marketing, finance, accounting and strategy.
Without such knowledge, managers and employees are likely to
repeat the mistakes of the past, break laws, and engage in
corrupt practices, thereby exposing companies to unacceptable
risk.
Being a good corporate citizen, being socially responsible,
acting with integrity and good corporate governance must be part
of a holistic strategy.
|