>> MIM Speaks
SURE-FIRE STRATEGY TO SUCCEED
JUNE 01, 2003 -
THE STAR
BY KAREN P. S. YUE
MENTION a short-haul, low-fare, high-frequency and
point-to-point American airline, and the name Southwest Airlines
immediately comes to mind.
Southwest Airlines began service in 1971 with just three jets.
It has since grown to become the fourth largest US airline (in
terms of domestic customers carried), operating 377 jets (as of
March 31, 2003). Year-end results for 2002 showed Southwest
Airlines' 30th consecutive year of profitability. Quite a
remarkable achievement by any standard.
Today, Southwest Airlines (a member of FORTUNE 500) employs more
than 35,000 employees and operates 2,800 flights a day to 58
cities all over the southwest of the US. Its 2002 financial
results boast of a net income of US$241mil (RM915 million) and
total operating revenue of US$5.5bil (RM29.6 billion).
What makes Southwest so successful? The answer lies in its
"uniqueness": being the only short-haul, low-fare,
high-frequency and point-to-point carrier, thereby choosing to
run a "different" race and sustaining its ability to compete
successfully in a high-cost high-risk industry. It's as simple
as that. This point was hammered home by Michael Porter, the
master of competitive strategy, at a conference in Kuala Lumpur
recently.
Southwest has both profitability and growth. These are two real
measures of success. Porter would have us know too that these
are the goals the right goals - for a strategy to begin with.
But how does one rate profitability? In the airline industry, as
in other industries, there is an industry average. Between 1998
and 2000, Southwest was bringing in a return on invested capital
(ROIC) of 12.4% compared to the airline industry average 6f
7.5%. Clearly, it is more profitable than the industry average.
To Porter, this spells (positive) strategic economics.
We can draw a local parallel in Air Asia. Established in
December 2001 and touted as "Asia's first low-fare no-frills
airline to introduce 'ticketless' travelling" with
"point-to-point" flights, Air Asia has characteristics similar
to those that have enabled Southwest to compete differently.
In Porter's competitive strategy equation, the ability to
compete differently is but one of five conditions that a
business must fulfil in order to have a sure-fire strategy to
compete.
What are the five conditions?
First, a business must have a different value proposition from
its competition. This is clearly illustrated in the case of
Southwest or even in Air Asia. Other examples abound: BMW with
its value proposition of "Superior-engineered, high performance,
sporty, customised automobiles at a premium price", and
Neutrogena Soap with its "Mild, residue-free soap formulated for
pH balance at a premium price."
The acid test is not in trying to be "the best" in whatever, but
rather by being "unique" in meeting a need (customers', of
course).
Secondly, the business has to employ a different value chain
from that of its competition. If you have the same product, the
same distribution channel, and the same everything else, you're
just competing on best practice, according to Porter. The set of
activities must be distinctively different from that of your
competition. You then compete on a different level.
Thirdly, have specific tradeoffs in your product or service
offerings. This means that in order to offer one unique value,
businesses will have to deliberately choose not to offer other
values. Firm decisions have to be taken on what services you
will not supply and what features you will not offer. The
strategy should define which customer you choose to serve; the
rest you're not interested.
The problem with many businesses, perhaps because of
over-zealous salespersons' representations, is that they want to
be everything to every customer. "Unless you add tradeoffs, your
strategy will be easy to copy," warned Porter.
In addition, it is interesting to note that businesses that
customise every product or service to the unique demands of
individual customers face the danger of its cost becoming so
high that it exceeds revenue. It may well be a fundamental goal
to satisfy customer needs by seeking to improve the
responsiveness to customers.
However, a business should not offer a level of responsiveness
beyond what its production process can profitably sustain.
Fourthly, integrate activities in your value chain together. It
is important to have "fit". "Southwest designed the service to
fit the utilisation of aircraft," said Porter.
Thus, the airline serves no meals on board. There are no seat
assignments, and there is no baggage check-in to other cities.
Its aircraft fly about an average of 7.2 flights per day or
about 12 hours per day-spending more time in the air than on the
ground, seemingly.
It sounds much like what Air Asia is doing in this part of the
world but on a much larger scale.
"It is hard to imitate such a business, because you have to
imitate everything, not just one feature," Porter emphasised.
Lastly, there has to be continuity. A business has to be
pursuing the same strategy for a while. How long? It takes about
three to five years for a strategy to manifest. In time,
customers, suppliers and other stakeholders will know and
understand what the business stands for. Consistency in the
unique proposition is the name of the game. Porter opines that
if you just follow the trend, you'll be average, not superior.
And that goes against the grain of effective competitive
strategy.
Given the importance of integration with traditional ways of
competing and the emergence of the Internet and other pressures
for competitive convergence, it is easy to see why many
companies do not have differentiating strategies to compete
well. Particularly in developing countries like ours, businesses
are more opportunistic in nature and there is a tendency to
compete on price.
This is all the more reason for companies to-heed-Porter' s
advice; that strategy should be developed and periodically
reviewed in a formal process rather than being left to occur
spontaneously. Indeed strategy development should not be a
democratic process. The leader must ultimately decide."
This is a follow-up to the article "Define strategy to compete"
that appeared in this column on 18 May 2003.For more details on
management development programmes or MIM membership, contact MIM
at 03-21654611, e-mail enquiries@mim.edu or visit www.mim.edu.
|