>> MIM Speaks
SUCCEEDING WITH TEAMS
FEBRUARY 20, 2000 -
STAR
By: S HADI ABDULLAH
What made Atilla the Hun, Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great
succeed? Not unsurprisingly, it is the same thing that makes
modern companies successful too. The answer is good teamwork
with motivated leadership, of course. The armies of old, for
that matter, the modern ones too, divided themselves into
manageable units - squads, sections, platoons, company, etc. The
identification of oneself with a particular group along with its
own norms, values, practices and uniqueness gives the individual
"unlimited" power to soar. The support, trust, common goals and
the savouring of success together is what makes a good team
unique.
What exactly is teamwork? Simply put, teamwork has the
components of common purpose and accountability, and is success
motivated.
The common purpose, common goals, targets and benchmark are the
beacons to reach the port of call. Teams need to know exactly
where to go, when, and in what numbers and quality (goods and
services). Beyond this, they want to be the best in the
industry, the neighbourhood or the country. Of course, company
culture, leadership, working environment and company politics
have a positive or negative effect. Assuming these influences
are positive, teams need clear guidelines. These are the
compass and corporate glue to accomplishment.
The second factor in teamwork is accountability. There is
responsibility, self- supervision and no passing of the buck.
Shirking responsibility is not condoned; in fact, it goes
against the very grain of teamwork. Team members "reprimand" one
another if this situation occurs. The feeling "if it is to be,
let it be me" pervades good teams. Ample examples of this are
found in teams in Texas Instruments, Samsung, Body Shop and
others.
Good teams are success motivated. They savour and shine when
they meet targets or excel expectations. They know that it is
their collective talents and not individual brightness that
contribute to good congruence. There is tremendous synergy, the
team mantra that never fails. Typically one success leads to
another, with celebrations and mementos. Success is certainly a
super motivator. That is why when building teams, leaders are
advised to provide them challenges and goals that are reachable.
When does a team need reworking? A sure sign is the lack of
progress towards objectives, meaning that teams go awry or make
little impact. Inappropriate leadership and not providing the
pathway and direction to the team is another. This, of course,
will result in the failure to make sound decisions. This could
mean that wrong decisions are made or that there is a delay in
decision making, or that no decisions are made.
A team would certainly need to be reworked if there is
interpersonal hostility. Team members do not see eye to eye;
there is cliquing. This problem, unless addressed, tends to
worsen with time. When the above is happening, team members tend
to shoulder unnecessary stress. Although individual in nature,
it dampens team spirit besides posing as a health hazard.
Low motivation and lack of spirit are also telltale signs for a
team to be reworked. Team members do not party or indulge in
much joking and laughter. There is a solemn, depressed and
"damp" atmosphere. A team in need of reworking most often shows
role confusion. Team members do not know exactly what their
roles are. Directions and team objectives are blurred. In this
case, team members are left to their own wits.
One very common factor in a poor team is its high turnover or
absenteeism. People begin slowly to leave a non-performing team
to seek more challenges or appreciation elsewhere. If they are
reluctant to leave, then you find the common melody called
absenteeism. Some will take medical leave or emergency leave.
The latter is often the result of a "grandmother's" death.
The above does not occur independently but rather in a cluster
or group. It is only logical for one thing to lead to another.
How do we know when teams have improved? Early in its renewal
would be the improvement of product or service quality. Overall
quality difference would be seen. The air itself would be
positive. Productivity improvement would be another. The number
of units produced, clients served, sales made would show a plus.
The next sign of improvement would be growth in profitability.
The team would bring in more than before, both individually and
as a group. The final sign of improvement would be "the job
satisfaction" that each member of the team experiences. Members
would be keen to work; they would enjoy their work and thrive on
the challenges and achievements. Of course, there would be very
little turnover and almost zero absenteeism.
Over the years, many forms of steps have been taken to build or
improve teams. Team members are chosen based on their interest,
aptitude, experience and expertise. They are given challenging
tasks and rewarded accordingly. From the training point of view,
a number of methods are used to harness and improve teams. A
common endeavour is what is called "experiential learning".
Experiential learning is a sure way of exposing people to
excellent behavioural practices and inculcating such in them. In
the recent past, outdoors experiential learning has proven to be
an effective way of building team and espirit de corp.
The outdoor exercise can vary depending on the emphasis one
wants to make. The various elements of leadership,
communication, interpersonal skills, creativity, listening
skills, self-confidence, discovering the power of group
cooperation, developing strategies, etc. can individually or in
various combinations be programmed and experienced. All the
activities are designed as metaphors for professional challenges
in an organization.
This like other team building activities results in great
exuberance and camaraderie among team members. One can often
find them hugging each other, cheering, singing, etc. The air is
positively charged; there is a "gung-ho" spirit, meaning that
"we can do anything, we are a super team". This spirit will last
for a fortnight. While people who have participated may be
friendlier than before, this need not necessarily result in
quality or product improvement. What is needed is for the
management to harness this overflow of energy and enthusiasm.
Again, teams can be set up to address certain company problems.
One such method is Action Learning, which uses simple techniques
for personal and organizational learning, while solving
problems. Introduced by Reg Revans, this method is used by
General Electric, Bristol Myers Squibb, and McKinsey & Company
among others. Other methods could be quality circles, task
forces, etc. The important thing is for the management to ride
the wave of enthusiasm and exuberance and not let it simmer down
to normalcy.
Teams are here to stay. How we build, nurture and let them grow
could mean success or failure. Mastering the methods of managing
teams is a must, more so in a world that needs teamwork plus
creativity, innovativeness and a maverick way of thinking. Look
at Genghis Khan, learn from General Electric, and develop your
own high performance team.
Think success, think team.
|