>> MIM Speaks
WORKERS DO WELL WHEN TREATED WELL
JULY 07, 2002 -
THE STAR
By ANNE RODRIGUES
IN trying to determine what leads to superior performance among
managers and his subordinates, Dr J Sterling Livingstone used a
paragraph from George Bernard Shaw's play, Pygmalion.
In it, protagonist Eliza Dolittle explains, "You 'see, really
and truly, apart from the things anyone can pick up (the
dressing and the proper way of speaking and so on) the
difference between a lady and a flower girl is not how she
behaves but how she's treated. I shall always be a flower girl
to Professor Higgins because he always treats me as a flower
girl and always will; but I know I can be a lady to you because
you will always treat me as a lady and always will."
Dr Livingstone applies this correlation between how one is
treated and how one behaves to the management-environment in
what is now commonly referred to as the "Pygmalion Effect".
He says that, in a nutshell, if one is treated properly, one
tends to live up to the expectations of the one who treats him
well.
This belief is in fact nothing new as it has been widely
recognised, especially in the medical profession where a
doctor's pessimistic prognosis can immediately lead the patient
to a doomsdays frame of mind, which can eventually be self-
fulfilling.
Similarly, students are often known to make monumental efforts
to fulfil their favourite teacher's expectations of them. The
popular conclusion from this is that we are all in a way like
Eliza Dolittle-we behave according to how we are treated; if we
consider ourselves to be properly treated by our superior, we
tend quite often to want to live up to his/her expectations of
us.
Malaysia, like most developing countries, has its share of
problems revolving around productivity among employees. As
managers, we see this quite often in the form of demotivated,
non-committed, sometimes even lazy employees. And as managers,
we too some times get demotivated, quite often by the acts of
out superiors.
For many of us, these bouts of demotivation and indifference
happen at least twice a year when we receive, management's
letter on our annual increment and our annual bonus.
Results of promotion exercises also have a similar impact
depending. of course on whether we find the results to our
favour or not. This has, in fact, led to a Malaysian version of
describing the Pygmalion Effect although it comes in a cruder
form: "if you pay peanuts, you should expect only monkeys."
This implies that if a staff believes he is lowly paid, he
perceives it as an indication that management values him less.
Then rightly or wrongly he tends to perform according to that
rating or valuation.
The reverse also applies. If a staff is highly paid relative to
the market, he immediately assumes that management has high
expectations of him and would strive to live up to that
expectation.
I also remember in the days before the breakup of the Soviet
Union, when inflation was high and wages low, a popular remark
making the rounds among workers when I was there was "the
government pretends to pay us and so we pretend to work."
There is on the other hand, another school of thought
particularly among senior management, who claim that there are
in fact two sides to the coin: "If all that the staff are
capable of is monkey business, then, of course, they should only
be paid peanuts."
I would assume that this refers to that distinct group of
incorrigible employees who will fail to perform whatever their
superiors' expectations and however well they are treated. This
group should, therefore, be only paid peanuts.
The tendency in Malaysia has always been to regard pay as a
major motivator and contributor to performance and productivity.
If a salesman cannot achieve his sales target, the excuse quite
often given, is he is paid less commission than others in the
industry and the solution offered is to increase the commission.
If a department suffers from high staff turnover, it is always
because other companies are having a higher salary scale than
ours. If the staff are not performing well, it is because they
are unhappy with their pay rather than because of our inferior
management techniques, and so on.
In coming up with the Pygmalion Effect, Livingstone offers
another way of looking at productivity, which should be of
interest to industry leaders in Malaysia. He claims that the
difference between employees who perform well and those who
perform poorly is not how they are paid but how they are
treated.
And one way to increase productivity is to develop managers who
will know how to treat subordinates in ways that will lead to
mutual expectation of superior performance. In effect, we need
managers who are Pygmalions.
Managers who are Pygmalions have the ability to create high
performance expectations that subordinates will strive to
fulfil.
The classic example is the success stories often related in
Amway where the diamond distributor, through a process of
positive reinforcement and motivation, manages to energise his
team of distributors to achieve certain set sales targets.
Similar success stories happen in the insurance as well as car
industries.
When sales persons are treated by their managers as super staff,
they try to live up to that image. But when managers display low
managerial expectations and treat their staff as "lost cases",
this negative expectation often becomes a self-fulfilling
prophecy.
Whilst we might be tempted to accuse Livingstone of stating the
obvious, the reality is that managers are more effective in
communicating low expectations to their subordinates than in
communicating high expectations to them.
In doing that, they become "negative Pygmalions". In my working
career, I have interacted with many negative Pygmalions...
managers who are cynics, ever ready to believe the worst of
their subordinates. They often, intentionally or
unintentionally, communicate their low expectations to their
subordinates and undermine their self-confidence, thereby
reducing their effectiveness.
For example, if they are allotted a female staff, their
immediate reaction is that it is a handicap because they will
always have to take maternity leave; if a staff whom they regard
lowly performs well, it's probably "a flash in the pan"; if they
get a non-graduate staff, the reaction will be, "You can't
expect much from him, he has no qualifications."
Top managers have the skills to know what targets to set for
their subordinates and the ability to transmit their
expectations to them such that they revel in the challenge
offered and rise to the occasion. Such managers have high
"positive self-regard" leading employees to have confidence in
them and believe that their high expectations of them can in
fact materialise if they strive hard enough.
To achieve this "positive self-regard", managers need the
industry knowledge and job skills to know how to set realistic
and achievable targets for each individual staff. They need to
be involved and know when to offer advice or prod them on.
They also have the ability to guide the team through the whole
exercise if required rather than just leave everything to the
team without it a clue as to how the job is to he done. Gone are
the days when managers got by with the instruction, "I don't
care how you do it but I want this report/result by this date."
Studies have also shown that "dangling the carrot" just beyond
the donkey's reach can be quite demotivating and eventually the
high expectations of the manager no longer become credible.
At the same time, the employee should not perceive the challenge
or the target set to be so easily achievable that no sense of
satisfaction is felt on its realisation and the employee might
see this as patronising.
There is nothing more motivating, exhilarating and inspiring
than a superior who believes in your ability and pushes you
towards greater challenges. Most people would be willing to
discount the pay factor for such an experience.
Pygmalion managers on the other hand must be wary of the group
of executives who are only capable of "monkey business". No
amount of proper treatment and high expectations could extract
high performance from them and the only way to deal with this
particular group of employees is the "carrot and stick"
approach, i.e. pay them peanuts until they feel the pinch and
decide to deliver' their money's worth of work.
Anne Rodrigues, a member of MIM, is the Group Finance Director
of Felda Holdings Sdn Bhd. She is an accountant by profession,
holds an MBA from the University of Bath and is a regular writer
on management and current issues.
|