>> MIM Speaks
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE REPORTING SYSTEM
APRIL 15, 2001 -
BUSINESS TIMES
by AZHARI-KARIM
COMPANIES are now familiar with their annual financial
statements. Beginning 2001, many Malaysian companies have also
started to report on their performance in managing issues
concerning the environment.
Yet a third component, corporate social responsibility (CSR),
will be added to the requirement, making it a triple bottom
line reporting system for companies.
As to the standard of financial reporting by our companies, it
was noted that the submissions by the public listed companies
have dramatically improved in the areas of transparency and
accountability.
But it was also believed that many companies are still too
focused on design rather than the substance: the writing and
financial information.
Keeping tab of a company's environmental policies, which is now
recognised as the second bottom line, is very new in Malaysia.
It comes just after the serious concern expressed over the
standards of corporate governance in our companies.
In a recent move by the relevant bodies, company directors have
been directed to attend special workshops on the subject.
On the environment, we are in fact following closely on
developments in the West, where the private sector has taken
the lead.
In Malaysia, the practice has been slowly catching up.
According to the criteria set by the organisers of the National
Annual Corporate Report Awards (Nacra), the environmental
reporting has been designed "to raise awareness towards the
apparent benefits that are to be derived from corporate
considerations of environmental issues and its protection".
Future Annual Reports will now carry statements on
environmental management, performance, and research and
development initiatives.
From representatives of the companies, it would appear that
many would like to comply with this new requirement.
But more should be done in the area of verification, compliance
and enforcement. A proper authority must also be instituted to
oversee this development.
Several issues that have arisen of late were concerned with the
willingness of companies to allow themselves to be inspected,
the time-frame for compliance and the sort of partnership that
must evolve among businesses as well as the authorities.
Another issue is involved with the need to keep up with global
trends.
In some areas, it seemed Malaysia is far ahead of other
countries in the region.
In others, we do lag very far behind even in the area of
providing basic amenities like water, food and shelter for
workers and the community at large.
Part of the problem is the lack of understanding and awareness
of the relevant issues regarding the protection of the
environment.
In Malaysia, at least there are far too many agencies claiming
to have involvement in it.
As a result, there appears to be a noticeable absence of
dialogue and interaction between the various agencies.
The last of the triple bottom line reporting is CSR. The
community aspect is at the heart of the Corporate Social
Responsibility reporting requirement.
Loosely defined, CSR is usually understood to cover the
following three areas: economic, social and ecological/
environmental responsibility.
All of these areas contain several aspects that are culture
dependent.
In addition, it is often considered that these areas are
underpinned by corporate values and ethical conduct.
It is also observed that each of this aspect is of interest to
a variety of stakeholders and they also include the employees,
authorities and even nongovernmental organisations.
When presented to a Malaysian audience, the idea of identifying
stakeholders, has posed some problems.
The term "stakeholder" is defined very narrowly in the
Malaysian context.
While here it is associated with people or institutions that
have a direct responsibility in the running and ownership of
the business, the term is applied in its widest sense, it is
long-term, multi and global.
The reporting format is also different. The practice in the
West has based it on the guidelines contained in the Global
Reporting Initiative (GRI), whose mission is to develop and
disseminate "globally applicable sustainability reporting
guidelines" for voluntary use by organisations reporting on the
economic, environmental and social dimensions of their
activities, products and services.
It may take some time before this practice can take hold in
Malaysia.
Apart from the problems in relation to the two other components
discussed earlier, there is still the issue of raising
awareness and getting people to buy the idea.
As a first step, companies can organise workshops to identify
stakeholders and consider such items as human rights, community
outreach programmes, product safety, environment and corporate
ethics.
Companies must need to commit themselves to report on the
management of their social responsibilities.
The agenda for the future of such a reporting system, if it is
going to be applied here, must rest with our business
community.
The long-term objective must as always include the company's
sustainability programmes and success in the economic,
environment and social areas.
Nacra and its organisers have a very important role here.
Perhaps in 2001, the triple bottom line reporting requirement
can be made mandatory.
|