>> MIM Speaks
THE I-THOU WAY SPELLS SUCCESS
DECEMBER 31, 2000 -
THE STAR
THE philosopher Martin Bauber propounds an interesting theory
about people and their relationships.
He says that these relationships are two-fold:
I-It relationship. Here Man always asks the question "What's
in it for me?" He always expects something back from these
relationships.
Man will therefore try to organise, use, abuse, control and
dominate everything and everybody. This would include the
environment, the rivers, forests and even officemates and
neighbours.
There will generally be a tendency to treat things as objects.
Common words associated with this category of relationship are
profits, efficiency, zero-sum game, exploitation networking,
etc.
I-Thou relationship. In this relationship, one does not expect
anything in return. Emotions such as respect, love,
friendship, honour and loyalty exist for their own sakes.
Here, one would seek harmony, balance and the principle of
"take only what you need."
Words such as care, share, love, friendship and honour would
fall into this category.
People often shift from I-It relationship to I-Thou
relationship and back. For example, after going to the mosque,
church or temple, one could be in the I-Thou sphere. On
returning to the office, as work catches one could quickly
shift to the I-It relationship.
It is generally true that I-It relationships would show short
term results. In the long run, these relationships would just
be based on "so long as you are holding a particular
position."
The I-Thou relationship may take longer to show results but it
nevertheless is a more lasting, fruitful and fulfilling one.
Khalil Gibran's point on lasting friendships comes to mind.
One should take them as a "sweet responsibility; never an
opportunity."
One needs to reflect constantly to check and ensure what
sphere one is in. It struck me how often managers treat people
like objects; opening the rule book at the slightest hint of a
problem.
How much the worker can produce, at what speed and quality
would become the paramount concern. In the midst of
benchmarking and optimising, one at times forgets that there
is a person and "soul" in question.
Sometimes bosses behave as if they possess the very soul of
their people just because they pay them salaries. People need
to be treated like people.
On the other hand, there are many enlightened employers today.
A number are multinationals but not-so-big ones, like the Body
Shop, Tom of Maine, Charles Schwab Corporation, Aveda
Corporation and Kao of Japan, have taken initiatives in this
area.
In the management sense, the I-It relationship managers will
always only look at the bottomline, shareholders value and
their own respective pockets.
These I-It stalwarts would indulge in common fads like cost
cutting, downsizing, laying off people, buying companies and
selling their "parts." A classical example of this type of
relationship is cited by Ghosal in the Sloan Management
Review.
Scott Paper went through all the processes. It was,
re-engineered, restructured, down-sized, outsourced and its
people retrenched. To the shock and dismay of the remaining
staff, the company was sold off to its "traditional enemy,"
Kimberly Clark.
The CEO, appropriately called "Chainsaw" Al Dunlop, justified
his action by claiming that he was looking after shareholder
value. While enhancing shareholder value, he destroyed the
company. This "auto-dismemberment," as the authors call it, is
indeed shocking.
On the other hand here are companies like Disney, Hewlett
Packard, Asea Brown Boveri, 3M, Microsoft and Kao, which seem
to excel with I-Thou relationships.
They are continuously bringing out new products and
technologies. They do not fear expansion or diversity. They
are upbeat and gung-ho about strategy and direction.
Interestingly, these I-Thou companies have created more
shareholder wealth than the break-up experts.
Andy Grave, CEO of Intel, could ask his people to do things
that other CEOs can't even think of. In the early 1980s many
electronic companies were laying off people. Andy Grave
adopted the 90% rule, meaning that everyone, including the
chairman, should take a 10% pay cut. This was done to avoid
lay-offs.
Not wanting to lose good people whom they had nurtured over
the years, Grave sold 20% of the company to IBM for $250mil.
Cost was still high, so he introduced the 125% rule. This
meant every one had to work 10 hours more a week with no pay
increase, to avoid cutbacks.
It was only after all these steps were taken did he decide to
close some operations. It was an open and exemplary practice.
Motorola takes the employability of its people seriously. The
organisation is decentralised in terms of resource management
and decision making. However, employee education is managed at
corporate level, through the Motorola University.
Each employee, including the CEO, has to undergo a minimum of
40 hours of formal course work every year. A couple of years
ago, Motorola Malaysia embarked on a programme to train its
assembly line operators.
An initiative was the formation of teams "composed of simple
kampung girls" who discussed ways to improve the workflow of
the assembly lines. A number of these people moved into
positions of line leaders, supervisors and executives. Some
went on to earn a diploma in supervisory management.
Lately, Motorola has come out with its "Individual Dignity
Entitlement(IDE) programme where Supervisors have to discuss -
six questions to a quarterly basis. Any negative reply is
considered a quality failure. This new moral contract puts
Motorola in the forefront of -people management.
Auto Deck Inc, a software developer, is training its managers
to be career counsellors. Managers are to regularly meet with
their staff and discuss work and promotion opportunities.
Seeing the value of people and the possibility of losing them
to the competition has made this company act thus.
Ian I. Mitroff reports the result of a study on spirituality.
He defines spirituality as "being connected with one's
complete self." People who thought that their organisation was
"more spiritual" also saw it as "more profitable" This was
because they were able to bring more of their "complete
selves" to the workplace. They were able to give more of their
creativity, emotions, intelligence -and passion. They loved
the I-Thou relationship in their set-ups.
Kao of Japan stands out as an I-Thou company. Yashio Maruta
always introduces himself as a Buddhist scholar first and then
as president of Kao. To him, they were linked. He has co-opted
the two Buddhist values of respect for the individual (no
elitism or, authoritarianism) and a commitment to learning.
It is said that collaboration organization wide is stupendous,
especially in the sharing of knowledge and expertise. Maruta
calls it the "power of collective accumulation of individual
wisdom" and this is what will help the organisation flow like
a stream. No wonder Kao is making waves.
In this era of a transient workplace, the traditional I-It way
of managing people is not going to work. Organisations that
treat people with dignity and as a powerful resource are going
to excel.
Organisations that make it known that day-to-day comfort is
important and show a genuine interest in their people will
forge ahead. Organisations should endeavour to harness the
whole person. They should look at people management as an
I-Thou relationship.
|