>> MIM Speaks
FACING UP TO NEW CHALLENGES
DECEMBER 17, 2000 -
THE STAR
THE last three and a half years have been turbulent for
virtually all business enterprises in the country. Caught
unprepared against a backdrop of continuing economic
prosperity for several years before the economic crisis, all
firms have been affected in one way or another.
The economic crisis has proven to be difficult and challenging
for the Malaysian business sector. The Malaysian economy went
into recession in 1998, and capital controls were subsequently
imposed to isolate the Malaysian, ringgit from speculation.
Decisive action on the part of the Malaysian Government to
resuscitate the economy contributed to the economic recovery
of 1999 and back to normal economic growth of 2000.
Described by economists as V-shaped economic movements, the
influence and impact on business enterprises must be quite
substantial. Even now, a major economic contributor of the
past, the construction industry, is suffering from a huge
overhang of vacant properties. Has the recovery permeated
across the Malaysian business sector?
It is against this backdrop of uncertainty and anxiety that a
Malaysian Business Trends Survey for 2000 was carried out by
the Malaysian Institute of Management. The overall purpose of
the survey is to assess how Malaysian business leaders are
responding to the challenges faced by their respective
businesses.
The survey has been completed, the findings have been
published and the report is how available from the Institute.
What are the major findings? The macro-environmental factors
covered in the survey identified governmental policies, the
economy, technology and "green" issues as key determinants. It
would appear that most firms were cautiously optimistic about
Malaysia's economic outlook, recognise that the Government's
handling of the economy benefitted them, accepted the
contribution of technology to business improvement, but were
relatively unconcerned about environmental, or "green," issues
influencing organisational policies.
From macro issues, the survey examined industry
competitiveness and business strategy. There appears to be
intense competition, and the main strategy employed has been
towards improving product/service quality, reliability and
speed 2 of response. The value chain has seen the use of
electronic database and communication, and the introduction of
just-in-time requirements by customers, as well as demands
made by companies on their suppliers.
Other strategies employed to improve profitability include
targeted marketing, greater financial control, better working
capital management, and increased product focus. It is
interesting to note that the simple, most important measure of
financial performance is a positive cash flow.
While it is heartening to note the high concern for
product/service quality as the key to gain competitive
advantage, this is not seen to be matched by efforts at
quality improvements through R&D, or training and development.
The majority of firms spent less than 1% of their capital
expenditure on R&D, and less than 1% of sales turnover on
training and development.
As we move towards the knowledge economy, it is also
heartening to note that most firms are embracing ICT, with
many producing a stated information strategy. There is the
expression by the firms surveyed that ICT is beneficial, and
its potential is yet to be fully realised.
The survey also covered manpower needs. Unlike the concern for
a drastic shortage of manpower in an earlier survey (1996),
the 2000 survey suggests that most firms do not anticipate any
labour or skills shortage in the current period for most job
categories.
Training is seen as the opportunity for increasing efficiency,
productivity and service quality. It is also significant to
note that most firms reported that their training is aimed at
changing employee attitude, adjustment to new technology, and
employee retention.
Given the increasing concern for corporate governance, the
survey reveals that the majority have an ethics code for
directors and managers, although fewer firms have a clear
mechanism for reporting violations.
The Business Trends Survey 2000 is indicative of how 123
responding CEOs and senior managers, from different industries
and organisations, think about the near-term future and the
responses they are adopting to compete. The findings are not
very different from the findings of the pre-crisis survey of
1996.
But the current business environment is very different from
1996. Globalisation and the AFTAIWTO regime, together with
substantial technological developments since, have combined to
make business operate in a different dimension, which should
attract different business models.
For example, the focus on cost leadership strategy, rather
than on more innovative products and product delivery strategy
ala e-commerce, is not good nough to compete long-term in the
global market place. This will, of course, suggest a much
higher allocation for R&D and human resource development as
the prerequisite for innovation.
Above all, we should learn from the turbulence of the recent
economic crisis. Prudent management is as much about
protecting the organisation from an unexpected change, as
preparing for growth. Hence, issues of corporate governance
and risk management should feature prominently in the
thinking, strategies, and direction of business enterprises in
the years to come.
|