>> MIM Speaks
NEGOTIATING THE IMPOSSIBLE
JULY 1, 2000 -
THE STAR
WHETHER we are aware of it or not, everyone of us negotiates
our way in situations we're confronted with from day-to-day.
Be it at home or at the workplace, with family, friends, the
management or the client, it's an activity we perform
unconsciously most of the time.
In business especially, negotiation becomes a formal act which
has many connotations of winning and losing. It is essentially
an art that allows finding out about the other party's needs,
reconciling them with your own and finding a mutually
convenient way of fulfilling those needs.
The first of this two-part series will take a look at what
strategic negotiation is all about and some aspects that are
vital for success.
The second part will address how an individual's personal
style can be a key negotiating resource as well as, how the
use of negotiation tactics can change the balance of power.
According to business negotiations specialist Valentina
Stolar, the key to successful negotiation is flexibility
because, at times, midway through the process, the parties
involved will have to accept that their initial expectations
were unreasonable and thus requires modification.
Stolar, speaking at a seminar workshop entitled "Strategic
Negotiations for the New Millennium", however, claimed that
the conception of negotiators being born and not made is, at
best, a myth.
"Admittedly, negotiating is a complex art. However, it is
possible to identify, understand and acquire those basic
skills which, when put together, creates an effective
performance. It is encouraging to know that there are very few
"rights and wrongs" or specific formulas for achieving
success.
"The very term 'negotiation', in essence, refers to a variety
of transactions in which the terms of exchange are not fixed.
if it were something that was fixed and cannot be changed ie.
price or quantity, then it leaves no room for negotiation,"
she reasoned.
In strategic negotiations, both parties try to achieve a
conclusion that they find satisfying and to their mutual
benefit - in other words, getting to YES.
Stolar emphasised that it is important for strategic
negotiators to establish common ground rather than dwell on
differences because this makes it easier for all sides to
co-operate.
"This includes leaving behind the "battlefield" behaviour,
egos and petty competitiveness and instead concentrating on
pooling resources to solve the problem.
"Most negotiations also fail because people tend to see, it as
an event and not a process. For this reason, it is important
that the parties undertake pre- and post-negotiation
preparations," Stolar said, adding that pre-negotiation
efforts showed a strong positive influence in the outcome of
85 per cent of cases studied.
Pre-negotiation preparations would include identifying both
the actual and psychological needs of all parties, conducting
research on the profile of members 'from the other team,
ascertaining their strengths and weaknesses, determining who
are the real decision-makers and key influencers, setting
clear objectives, a specific agenda and devising a strategy.
"Before going in for the formal negotiation, one area your
team certainly must address is the possible ulterior motives
and needs of the opposing team because, very often, the key
motivator or influencer is what is unstated and not implied.
Other variables that should be managed are factors like time,
venue, seating arrangements and emotions as this can have
significant impact on the "mood" of the whole process.
Once formal negotiation begins, skilled negotiators should
take control from the word "go" and maintain the momentum
throughout. The key tasks in the beginning game would include
taking control of handling introductions and seating
arrangements - sit somewhere that does not disadvantage you.
"Make sure you keep the initiative by stating the ground
rules, suggesting the agenda and being the first to get down
to business. Another point to remember is to focus on the
other party's position rather than on your own.
"This would include preparing lots of questions in advance so
that you avoid having to think on your feet, concentrating,
listening and watching for non-verbal signals, evaluating
whatever is said without emotion and reserving judgment until
all the facts are on the table," Stolar said.
The fundamentals involved in the opening position are to
always accept the other team's opening position for what it
is, always test it and never accept the first offer.
Subsequently, the onus is on your team to communicate your
position with clarity and confidence so that you are clearly
understood.
However, she warned against having unrealistic and incredibly
high demands as this may result in an early deadlock. The key
is to keep proposals simple as people are wont to disagree
with things they do not understand.
"Ending the formal process also requires attention to
particular details like communicating credible finality in
order to make the other side believe that you have reached
your limit and will go no further.
"It is also useful to use deadline pressure to keep the ball
rolling. Oftentimes, many negotiators will not move until
they feel a deadline pressure and see the consequences of not
reaching an agreement," she said.
Finally, never end any negotiation process on a negative note.
Instead, always let the other party save face by making the
point of complimenting them on their valuable contribution, if
your team ends up the winner. Contrarily, avoid letting the
other side believe that they have lost or have been tricked as
you may then have problems implementing the agreement.
Post-negotiation initiatives would include documenting the
process as well as terms and conditions to safeguard against
noncompliance, implementing what was agreed upon and
monitoring the situation to gauge its level of success.
Stolar stressed the need for all parties to comply with what
was finally agreed upon because in most cases, there was the
tendency for the same people to be involved the next time a
deal has to be negotiated.
"Once you have reneged on a promise or verbal agreement, don't
expect the other side to play fairly the next time your team
has to deal with them," she said, adding that this is where a
personal commitment turns out to be more binding than a
business commitment.
Due to the fact that all negotiations happen at two levels,
the first being factual or objective, the second being
personal, subjective and emotive, past experience has shown
that personal commitments tend to carry more weight compared
to signatures on dotted lines.
"It makes a world of difference if one individual from the
other side gives a personal commitment to comply with all the
terms an conditions. That way, even if other team members
decide to play foul, the one individual will feel obliged to
keep his/her word," Stolar said, reasoning that ultimately, it
is "people" who negotiate and not companies.
|