>> MIM Speaks
VALUES THAT PRESERVE HUMANITY
MAY 21, 2000 -
THE STAR
THE above quotation, collated from Dr Tarcisius Chin's
article, "Preserving Humanity in New Era" (Sunday Star, April
23,2000), surnmarises the mounting global concerns regarding
the increasing dehumanisation of values, relationships and
quality of life.
The importance of scientific progress is undeniable, but only
so long as "we recognise that they are opportunities to help
Mankind improve on its quality of life" (Chin). Scientific
advancement in the name of technological sophistication is no
progress at all if it meant the loss of self-worth and Man's
respect for one another.
We can learn much from the wisdom of the ages. The
commentaries of Socrates, Al-Ghazali and Confucius remind us
of how we should behave to uplift the mobility of the human
person.
The sayings of Confucius are particularly relevant as his
Analects provide enormous details on appropriate responses to
specific situations. Example: "When the men of Lu were
rebuilding the Main Treasury, Min Tzu-chien said, 'Why don't
we keep its old style? Why do we have to change it
completely?' Confucius said, 'This man doesn't say much but
when he does say anything, he is right on the mark'."
(Analects, II:13)
Like Min Tzu-chien, we can ask why is it that our quest for
scientific progress in the name of a better life requires us
to abandon completely our old values and ways of doing things.
In this article, I wish to share my view of how we could
cultivate (or restore) values that will "preserve humanity in
new era." For this purpose, I focus on Confucius' idea of the
virtuous being, or chun-tzu and how this Confucian ideal can
be used to develop humanity within the technologised and
individualised selves of the millennium beings.
Confucius believed in the goodness of Mankind and that every
Man is endowed with the capacity to strive for a better
quality of life.
During his lifetime, he saw how powerful people made their
subordinates into slaves, how rulers violated their positions
of power, how states forfeited their sovereignty, how nations
lost their citizens and wealth and how families were
destroyed by betrayal and greed and how common human beings
lost their self-esteem, dignity, honour and life.
Confucius was, therefore, preoccupied with matters concerning
humanity, ethics and morality. A society whose members have
internalised and behaved according to the code of ethics and
moral conduct would have no room for evil deeds, fear of
personal safety and punishment.
Confucius, however, did not believe that humanity or goodness
(jen) is an innate quality, or that which all human beings
possessed naturally. Instead, goodness - all the virtues
embodying humanity - has to be cultivated through a continual
process of learning and internalisation.
The Analects is basically about Confucius' code of moral
conduct for the common Man aspiring to be a chun-tzu.
Confucius' chun-tzu, originally to mean son (tzu) of a prince
or ruler (chun), stands apart and above the common Man (the
ordinary human being behaving to the precepts of others
instead of self) and the small Man (the inferior Man who acts
according to his or her egoistic desires).
The chun-tzu, as perceived by Confucius, acts in the name of
righteousness, based on his or her own evaluation and
autonomous reasoning of what is right and just. The chun-tzu
is thus an enlightened human being with jen (goodness) because
he or she has managed to learn the Way (Tao) of moral conduct
and internalise the "Nine Cares" of jen:
"In seeing he is careful to see clearly; In hearing he is
careful to hear distinctly; In his looks he is careful to be
kindly; In his manner to be respectful; In his words to, be
loyal; In his work to be diligent; When in doubt he is careful
to ask for information; When angry he has a
care for the consequences and when he sees a chance of gain,
he thinks carefully whether the pursuit of it
would be consonant with the Right." (Analects, XVI:10).
We can understand the significance of jen when-we look at its
origin in Mandarin. The word jen consists of two characters,
jen, meaning 'Man,' and 'rh, meaning 'two.' Jen, therefore,
implies that"Man, as a biological-cum- social being, is
mutually dependent upon one another. Man needs to live and
relate with others in order to fulfil their needs.
Human relationships therefore form the fundamental source
paving the road to self-actualisation and personal
development. Such is the importance of human beings to and for
one another that when Confucius was asked about
the meaning of jen, his reply was "love others" (Analects,
XII: 22).
Jen is the essence of all positive human attributes; without
it, how can human beings perform their roles and relate with
others? Below are some examples of what Confucius meant by a
chun-tzu and the jen accrued to him:
"Tzu-kung asked about the true gentleman. The Master said, 'He
does not preach what he practises till he has practised what
he preaches'." (Analects, II:13).
"A chun-tzu can see a question from all sides without bias.
The small Man is biased and can see a question only from one side."
(Analects, II:14).
|