>> MIM Speaks
ROLE OF THE EPF IN AVERTING OLD-AGE FINANCIAL CRISIS
MARCH 19, 2000 -
NEW STRAITS TIMES
AS we begin a new century, global trends and issues of social
security will continue to challenge governments everywhere as
they work to provide viable schemes to benefit growing and
ageing populations.
Some of these schemes may be extensions of established old-age
pension systems; others may be new or additional ones which
aim to cater to changing needs. In some countries, private
voluntary pension schemes have emerged to complement or to
replace mandatory public pension schemes.
Whoever the pension provider, and whatever the approach, the
raison d'etre of most pension systems is to ensure protection
against the problems associated with ageing which include loss
of occupation and income, and the need for healthcare.
Put simply, the challenge for governments is to avert the
old-age crisis which, if not managed, will put an enormous
strain on limited resources.
In Malaysia, as with many other countries, a public
pay-as-you-earn social security system is in place through the
Employees Provident Fund which was set up nearly 50 years ago.
As the first mandatory national provident fund in the world,
the EPF is an institution synonymous with old age security.
Set up initially with the intention to provide an opportunity
to save for retirement and allow withdrawal of the capital sum
at retirement age, the EPF has over the years undertaken
reforms in line with changing needs and expectations and has
begun to provide for partial withdrawals in a number of
situations, including for medical treatment, housing purchases
and education.
One of the challenges of the EPF today is to manage the
growing popularity of other instruments of long-term savings,
including unit trusts and insurance schemes, and to strengthen
public confidence in it as a guaranteed provider of individual
security in the event of loss of income, old age or ill
health.
The debate about the future of social security schemes is
interesting, with countries opting for a variety of
instruments: from voluntary to employer-led systems,
industry-led schemes, open funds to which anyone may
contribute, life annuity, individual accounts, etc. Some
governments may not wish to manage social security systems and
prefer to pass It to the private sector.
It is recognised universally, however, that old- age
protection is a fundamental right and that it is important to
have in place from the start a clear regulatory framework and
a strong supervisory authority.
Social security and pension reformists recognise the
desirability in most cases of retaining the public social
security system as a safety net.
Studies have found that private account managers have not
necessarily been competitive in terms of optimising client
returns, nor have rates of return been as high as envisaged
they would be.
Another drawback is that privatisation of social security
allows employees the freedom to choose private account
managers and, sometimes these choices may be less than
prudent.
WITH a base of 9.2 million members, the EPF remains one of the
largest institutions of its kind in the world. Each month,
contributions amount to an estimated RML2 billion.
The EPF puts these contributions into several income-bearing
instruments in order to sustain a reasonably comfortable level
of dividend for its members.
The EPF is guided by an investment policy that values
high-security and low-risk investment products. Transparency
and accountability ensure that the fund keeps close to its
investment principles. Integrity of investment decisions is
crucial when managing public funds.
The EPF is committed to paying contributions, plus dividends,
in full as per its mandate. In 1999, it paid out RM1.97
billion to 72,719 retirees above the age of 55. This does not
include withdrawals for housing and medical needs.
Recent World Bank statistics have shown that in Malaysia the
number of people over 60, which touched one million or 5.9 per
cent of the population in 1991, would have increased to 1.4
million nine years later. By 2020, the grey population will
number 3.2 million - almost one in 10 Malaysians.
The benefit of contributing to a mandatory savings scheme is
that the intricacies of investment are taken care of.
A recent meeting of directors of social security organisations
in Asia and the Pacific under the auspices of the
International Social Security Association (ISSA) debated the
pros and cons of privately-managed old-age pension schemes
versus publicly-managed ones and generally found there is a
wide divergence of opinion on the issue and that
privately-managed schemes may not be satisfactory replacements
for the traditional defined-benefit publicly-managed system.
Indeed, it was noted that the principal objective of pension
is adequate retirement income and any reform that jeopardises
this cannot be considered worthwhile.
|