>> MIM Speaks
RETURN TO THE JOB OF MANAGING
FEBRUARY 13, 2000 -
THE STAR
FOR much of the closing years of the last century, there was a
call for managers to return to the basics of management. It
was not a reaction to the mid-80s or late-90s recession, but a
serious expression of what was considered as not right with
the profession.
As early as the 70s, British Institute of Management director
John Marsh was calling on the management community to return
to basics at various international conferences.
It was not to be. Rather than returning to basics, management
thought exploded into esotericism as new management gurus
appeared to champion different and sometimes quite
contradictory prescriptions and remedies for business
ailments.
In 1996, John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge of the
Economist wrote a scathing account of The Witch Doctors,
management theorists and writers who have turned the subject
of management into a billion-dollar business enterprise for
books, consultancy and seminars.
Before the economic downturn, quite a number of management
gurus from the United States were delivering seminars in Kuala
Lumpur for as much as US$50,000 per day!
There is danger that the discipline of management is put on
the same pedestal of entertainment as we gravitate to yet
another guru who is able to offer special insights and able to
deliver them in the most entertaining manner.
A lot of junk has been turned out as ideas cannot stand the
test of time and become obsolete. Like in the world of
entertainment and fashion, management gurus have produced fads
which have strong appeal for only a limited period of time.
It would seem that business schools would become the purveyors
of the new gospel of management as the new books and
publications of the new gurus found their way into the reading
lists of MBA and other business programmes.
The result was an explosion of all sorts of management
programmes and it became almost fashionable for all
universities and colleges to deliver probably the most
lucrative business product - the MBA degree.
Quite rapidly, the product underwent marketing scrutiny and a
family of MBA-type products were offered to meet different
consumer segments. The traditional concept of the MBA as the
bridge between technical expertise and practical business
application faded and is now replaced by hidden promises of
business success if' only one obtains an MBA.
The fault is not only on the business schools. Consumers are
largely to be faulted as demand for the MBA has not waned,
despite findings in the US that the qualification has been
overrated. The unfortunate aspect is that many Malaysians
cannot discriminate the good MBA from the bad and base their
decision on selecting the MBA programme that is the cheapest
and/or easiest to complete.
When the MBA was first introduced, there was a lot of
scepticism as to the value of the degree. Managerial
competence cannot be taught; it has to be experienced, the
critics argued. Hence, the response was the case method of
instruction in which actual historical business situations
were simulated for analysis and decision-making.
Like the aircraft simulator for the training of pilots, MBA
students could be developed to respond to a given business
situation. The theory is that if a student is exposed to say a
thousand different and varied business situations, he would
have developed a thought and response process that is rational
and "superior."
Unfortunately, most business schools have chosen the academic
route of providing lectures in delivering the curriculum of
the MBA programme. Lectures are good for delivering knowledge,
but cannot effectively impart skills.
As a consequence, most MBA graduates know a lot, but lack the
competence of application. They are familiar with the buzz-
words of the gurus, but are short on the ability to act, teach
or consult.
As the mystique of the MBA is unveiled, the return to basics
becomes a more compelling concern. We need managers who can
perform the job of managing.
The key managerial functions are planning, organising, leading
and controlling. Those functions seem to have been sidetracked
in favour of functional areas; hence the proliferation of
specialised MBAs in finance, operation, human resource and
marketing, which more correctly should be designated as Master
of Finance, etc.
Irrespective of where we are, the job of all managers is to
plan, organise, lead and control, This function is universal
to all sectors, industries and functional areas.
We seem to have been so oversold by the witch doctors that we
have failed to realise that the designation MBA stands for
Master of Business Administration. How many new MBA graduates
can really claim to have mastered management? Mastered
management studies, yes, but a master in the art of
management?
With the new millennium, there is a quiet revolution among
management professional bodies to offer competency-based
development. This move will focus move on the job of the
manager and will require more experiential learning with less
need for lectures.
Returning to basics is a call that now needs to be taken more
seriously than before.
|