>> MIM Speaks
ACT LOCAL BEFORE GOING GLOBAL
JULY 11, 1999 -
THE STAR
WHAT steps do we take to retain some control over the process
of globalisation in as much as it negatively affects Malaysia?
The answer lies with you, and not the government, at least not
just the government. This is where we must stop whining to the
Government and acknowledge that it is time to be weaned from
its succour.
I do not pose this challenge frivolously-there are innumerable
examples in history that illustrate that it is not the
business of politics, but the politics of business that is the
locomotive of economic growth. A case in point is the original
East India Company, which went forth and opened new markets
until, finally, it is said that 10,000 Englishmen managed 100
million Indians.
In the Malaysian case, the Government has opened numerous
doors, particularly abroad. I would strongly urge you to forge
strategic alliances and go to areas where we share an
affiliation: the Far East, Middle East, Africa and Central
Asia would offer ample opportunities for business.
In the management of people, products and profits, I am
confident of the Malaysian ability to compete and, ultimately,
conquer.
What does all this entail? I believe that the time for
fault-finding and finger-pointing is over unless you are
advocating introspection. Upon reflection, it would appear
that some house-cleaning and home-improvement measures must be
undertaken to regain our strengths in the global village:
One, pursue productivity-driven growth with a vengeance. We
must regain lost ground, our comparative advantage through the
more efficient allocation of resources to the higher growth
segments of our businesses, outsourcing materials and
activities according to core competencies, as well as
restructuring to workflow to increase momentum.
Two, ascend the technological ladder and develop indigenous
research and development (R&D). In line with the national
effort to attract world-class companies, we should redouble
efforts to develop a high-technology, high value-added
environment, including upgrading the skills of our workforce.
Three, ensure the development and production of world-class
products and brands, as well as the provision of excellent
services. On the last point, it is my opinion that we have
acres of room to improve. The establishment of a reputation
for excellence would place us at an advantage against the "big
boys."
Four, to meet the globalisation challenge head-on, it is
imperative that companies develop a strong team of
highly-skilled and trained managers. This will allow a
company to shift towards a more flexible management structure
which can anticipate and accommodate change.
You will also have to use attraction rather than coercion to
achieve desired objectives. The question may be asked, how
many skilled and technologically honed Malaysians are working
abroad because the home country for this or that reason cannot
attract them home?
Five, be willing to take long-term risks and seek partnerships
with foreign companies and venture into new, emerging markets.
Company strength and resilience can be developed based on
lower operating costs, mobility, market diversity and
segmentation, production of specialty and quality goods, and
more importantly, establishing strategic alliances.
Six, be mindful of social responsibilities and the
environment. Time and time again, we have seen in Malaysia
and countries around us that the costs of sacrificing
environmental concerns for profit are too costly, in terms of
time, money and, more importantly, at the risk of innocent
lives. Business decisions should, therefore, incorporate
ecological concerns to ensure long-term sustainability of the
organisation.
This is a particularly big point for me. I discover
effervescent thinking and special talents in Malaysia. Mimos,
for example, is a fertile incubator of necessary ideas, steps
and actions the country must take to anticipate and
participate in globalisation.
In the old days, the chief clerk was the absolute authority in
all matters within his jurisdiction. Even officers had to
communicate with the CC with respect and decorum. If you lose
the support of the CC, nothing can get done.
Today, you realise that even the chief clerk cannot be of much
help. If you ask him why such and such a regulation is there,
even he does not know why, he only knows what it is and how it
is applied.
The same is true of most other so-called "experts in
authority." Their best response is "that is the way it has
always been done." The only way out of this quagmire seems to
be to revert to the benefit of group wisdom.
Whereas in the older model, efficiency and survival meant
individual skills and knowledge, today it appears that
teamwork seems the only alternative for achieving high
performance. Therefore, brainstorming a problem and getting
multiple perspectives seems the order of the day.
It is one thing to say that the markets of the world are
coming together. But are global markets creating
globally-minded companies? Are we seeing the emergence of
rootless corporations guided only by market opportunities, not
by allegiance to their home countries? In the political realm,
are global companies overwhelming the efforts of nations to
preserve their distinctive identities?
It is perhaps reassuring to note that, according to The Myth
of the Global Corporation by Doremus, Keller, Pauly and Reich,
the answer is no. The authors see enormous differences among
multinational companies, which they trace to the unique
political and economic characteristics of their home
countries.
Therein lies hope for Malaysian companies that venture abroad:
globalisation can actually strengthen national differences,
not erode them. This means that Malaysian corporations could
locate strategic business units in areas to capitalise on the
indigenous advantages.
Which brings to mind the oftquoted phrase: "Think global, act
local." I would like to propose a slight amendment so that it
reads: "Think local, act global."
What's reassuring is that the phenomenon of globalisation need
not be demonised; instead it can be localised as is apparent
from the hybrid word, glocalisation, a melange for the global
and the local.
In this era of globalisation and rapid social and economic
changes, no country can attain economic well-being by closing
its borders and restricting the flow of goods, capital,
technology and people.
The choice of a suitable business the right partners, and
prudent capital management is all that is needed to assure
good returns.
With a strong entrepreneurial spirit, good work ethics,
perseverance and extensive networking, Malaysian managers and
entrepreneurs would be able to venture and establish
themselves successfully in any country.
Within the framework of a highly competitive and challenging
environment in the next millennium, only those who heed the
call-and measure up-will be assured of a place in the winners'
circle.
|