>> MIM Speaks
THE MAKING OF A GOOD MANAGER
MAY 9, 1999 -
THE STAR
IT has long been recognised that economic and social
development is the consequence of good management. But what
constitutes good management?
As a profession, management is universal with considerable
ease of entry. There is no barrier to the practice of
management.
Individuals can be given managerial duties and
responsibilities, even without adequate preparation,
education, training or experience.
Learning on the job and following the behaviour of more senior
managers are the traditional ways managers acquire competence.
Without adequate assessment, feedback and correction of
behaviour, such competencies can vary enormously.
Hence, while we can have excellent managers we can also have
really incompetent managers.
Because of the powerful consequence of managerial action, it
is important that there should be some minimal standards of-
performance expected of our managers.
There are now immense opportunities to assist in the
development.
Courses and seminars in practically every area of managerial
work are available to the Malaysian manager to help improve
performance.
What is probably lacking is the Guidance that supports good
management practice.
Individual managers fall back on religion or corporate culture
to provide the benchmarks for ethical behaviour.
As managers, we do not have the equivalent of the Hippocratic
Oath of the medical profession and, therefore, perceptions as
to what is permissible can be quite different for different
managers. Indeed where do we draw the line?
As an organisation that seeks to promote high ethical
behaviour, the Malaysian Institute of Management recently
released to its members a Code of Ethics specifying what it
considers to be the principles of good management practice.
These principles are now reproduced for the benefit of the
Malaysian management community.
The principles cover three areas of managerial
responsibility-the manager as the person, the manager and the
organisation, and the manager and the community.
The Manager as the Person
Managers have personal responsibilities, and should:
* Demonstrate integrity and humanity and avoid all
discriminatory practices including those relating to race,
sex, religion and politics.
* Have regard for the interests of society in carrying out the
policies of the organization.
* Not injure or attempt to injure maliciously or recklessly,
directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects
or business of others.
* Respect the confidentiality of information which comes to
them in the course of their duties.
* Balance the interests of their organizations, employers,
colleagues or friends with their personal responsibilities and
commitments.
* Engage in continuing Yearning to enhance managerial and
professional competence.
* Accept. only such work as they believe they are competent to
perform and, as necessary, obtain expert advice. .
* Be conversant with codes of other institutes and
associations relevant to their responsibilities.
* When called upon to give an opinion, to the best of their
ability do subjectively.
The Manager and the Organisation
Managers should take appropriate action to achieve and review
the objectives of the organisation.
The action taken should include:
* The effective and economic management of all available
resources.
* The appointment, training and development of employees,
seeking to integrate their aspirations with the requirements
of the organisation.
* The creation of a humane, safe, healthy and satisfying
working environment.
* The development of effective communication, understanding
and co-operation between all employees.
* The practise of delegation of authority wherever possible
and the acceptance of responsibility for the work of
subordinates.
* The fair and equitable treatment and remuneration of
employees.
* Full disclosure of any material personal interest in any
matter it which the organization is a party or involved and
over which the manager will be deciding in part or in whole on
behalf of the organisation.
The disclosure is to be made nor later than the time for the
decision and thereafter he shall refrain from participating in
the decision.
* The frequent review of objectives.
* Respect and act in accordance with the prevailing set
policies and objectives of the organization.
* Refrain from speaking, acting or behaving in any manner
which is detrimental to the interest of the organisation.
The Manager and the Community
Managers should recognise the interests of the community and
act accordingly.
The action taken should include:
* Preserving and, wherever possible, improving the quality of
life within the member's sphere of influence, including making
every endeavour to conserve the environment.
* Promoting the development of further understanding in
society of the role and place of the business community.
* Ensuring all contracts and terms of business are clear,
copcise and honoured in full, unless terminated or modified by
mutual consent.
* Ensuring all communications are informative, true and not
misleading, respecting cultural and moral standards, the
principles, practices and beliefs of all parties and the
dignity of the individual.
* Eradicating corrupt practises.
* Participating in public affairs and utilising available
professional capacity.
* Instilling in others the need for ethical behaviour and
sound management practices.
While the MIM Code of Ethics is a declaration of intent, it is
nevertheless a statement of the high standards of behaviour
which should apply to all members of the institute, standards
which are rightly demanded of managers by the community.
The need for an improvement in the public image of the manager
is widely recognized.
The code will help place managers in a more appropriate light
in the eyes of the employees, younger people contemplating a
career in management and the community at large.
It will give greater credence to the assertion that managers
are the most important and responsible section of the
workforce.
In releasing the code, the institute is also hopeful that
other kindred institutions, employers and organizations will
begin to examine the issue of minimum standards of behaviour
which could lead eventually to similar out-comes of expression
for their members, employees and subscribers.
|