>> MIM Speaks
LEADERSHIP FOR UNCERTAIN TIMES
AUG 23, 1998 -
THE STAR
THE Asian economic crisis has drawn a chorus of negative
comments from presidents and prime ministers to taxi drivers
and street vendors. Comments have ranged from foreign
conspiracies to cronyism, to conspicuous consumption to poor
macro and micro-management.
It is now academic to trace its cause(s). It is more useful to
seek the solutions.
Make no mistake. The economic slowdown will just not go away;
if anything, most indicators suggest that recovery will be
protracted over the long haul and greatly influenced by what
happens to other economies.
Independence has brought us wealth and prosperity; it has also
delivered instability, uncertainty and the consequence of the
so called contagion effect.
In uncertain times, the best laid out plans suddenly do not
make sense. Add to it the problem of cash flow and the knives
are flashed.
There is a lesson to be learned.
Managing in a stable, steady state is relatively easy; you
plan for growth and put into motion tactical and strategic
actions to deliver your budget.
The job of management is to ensure that the budget is
delivered and to take corrective action whenever a variance is
detected. Much of management is technical and operational.
Managing in uncertain times characterized by crisis,
turbulence and chaos is an entirely different proposition.
The rulebook is no longer relevant nor is past precedence
valid.
The vital quality that will be demanded is not operational
efficiency but leadership.
Leadership is a scarce commodity. In good times, we are
impressed with a long list of corporate "leaders", but in bad
times, where are they?
Sadly, it is in difficult times that we need more leaders to
show the way forward. Do we circle the wagons, stand and
fight, negotiate, or what? Not taking a stand is one way of
inviting slaughter.
It is apparent that issues of crisis and change management are
now more relevant than issues of operations research and
management science.
Over the last decade, there had been strong sentiments that
the key to managing the future is in corporate leadership. But
what has actually happened is tokenism. Ninety-five per cent
of American managers, for example, say the right thing. Only
5% actually do it.
Once upon a time, the orthodoxy was that you either had
leadership or you didn't. And if you had, you surely didn't
share it.
Nowadays, in order to thrive and survive, managers are called
upon to lead, to empower and to utilise the intellectual
capital of the group.
Unlike the leaders of old who hold all the cards, the new
corporate leaders do not expect to solve all the problems
themselves, realising that no one person can deal with the
emerging and colliding tyrannies of change, speed, quality,
customer satisfaction, innovation, diversity and technology.
But as leaders, they can initiate action and help install
environments conducive for group transformation.
Judging from the literature, the study of management is
somewhat old hack. The in-thing now is leadership, which has
spawned an industry of training providers.
How does one train someone to be a leader? One approach is
through personal growth and development ala Outward Bound:
The idea is to capitalise on passion as the pathway to
leadership and is suitable for the physically inclined. Using
adventure learning based an "rocks and ropes", team-work is
demonstrated as the ingredient of leadership.
The suggestion is that what teamwork can do for physical
activities, it can also apply equally to corporate work in
getting the best out of people.
A second approach favoured by psychologists and social
scientists is to use feedback to create self-awareness. This
involves evaluating the leadership skills one possesses and
adjusting them according to the feedback received.
A third approach favoured by academics is to create conceptual
awareness in the belief that if one grasps the concept, one
can act on it. Intellectual in approach, the action is in the
classroom and instruments used are exercises and case studies.
The fourth route favoured by training provider is specific and
is skills oriented. Take, for example presentation skills,
which is considered an important tool of an effective leader.
The theory is that through practice skills are built and after
a while the participant is in a much better position to
deliver an inspiring speech.
All four pathways to developing leadership have pluses and
minuses. They all contribute but each by itself is somewhat
inadequate to the task.
The conceptual route is too IQ driven, while the feedback
route is too EQ (emotional intelligence) driven. What is
required is to blend both IQ and EQ characteristics into the
development programmes, plus adding SQ (spiritual
intelligence) features as well.
SQ is currently surfacing in the concept of values-based
leadership in which the leader helps define and inculcate
desirable values in the organization.
I have previously made a case for the holistic development of
the manager through an adroit blending of IQ, EQ and SQ
qualities under this column (Sunday Star, June 7).
The case for the development of leaders is even more
pertinent. While managers are technocrats leaders are forces
for social good.
IQ is necessary as Asian society places high regard and
respect for the person who has Credentials who can think and
who can introduce new ideas.
EQ is a stronger requirement for the leader than for the
manager without the ability to relate with others and to
establish empathy, leadership is but an empty word.
SQ is perhaps the strongest requirement in leadership. It
provides the glue to hold the group together.
In the corporate world, it is the set of values that are
shared by the corporate community, often translated into a
code of conduct upon which business is done
In fact, there is an emerging notion of the leader as the
servant and the epitome of the practice of the cherished
values of the organisation.
In a more transparent society the leader is expected to be
whiter than white if he or she is to be followed with
enthusiasm and conviction.
There has been too much talk about leadership and the need for
more leaders. When economic conditions are tough as they are
now, it is high time to walk the talk.
Leadership is not about knowledge; it has everything to do
with participation, interaction and experience.
Above all, it is about action. And the first action needed is
for leaders to figure out ways to teach everyone else how to
be one.
|