>> MIM Speaks
THE HIGH PRICE OF POOR RISK ANALYSIS
JUNE 4, 1998 -
THE STAR
AT TIIE start of the economic crisis in mid-1997, the
Malaysian stock exchange had an estimated value of RM550bil.
But by the end of 1997 the value had shrunk to RM348bil, with
a real capital loss of about RM200bil.
As much of these represent capital flight, it is a major
factor that caused our ringgit to depreciate by some 35%. This
and other indirect losses totalled some RM800bil, a rather
staggering sum which will take the country years to recover.
As Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad has said, we
have been set back by 10 years.
We have "fought" what Sun Tzu describes as a "protracted" war:
When a campaign is protracted, the resources of the state will
not be enough to last the strain ... when your weapons are
dulled, your ardour dampened, your strength exhausted and
treasures spent, other rulers will rise to take advantage of
your extremity. when no man, however wise, will be able to
avert the inevitable consequences.
Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, we do not
see a clever operation that was prolonged. There is no
instance of a country benefiting from prolonged warfare. (Sun
Tzu 2:3-6.)
The losses are numbing; While in the previous recession of the
mid- 1980s, we counted in millions, now it is in billions.
The currency was not much affected back in the mid-1980s,
probably because the role of foreign funds was minimal and
capital flight was likewise too.
However, the drastic decline in economic values does not hit
all sectors of the economy equally.
In fact, some sectors, like plantations, do even better.
Certain manufacturing industries continue to post profits.
Only in certain sectors like property and finance that the
losses are serious.
The losses in the finance sector are attributed to
over-lending, especially to the property sector.
Interviews with businessmen reveal that the single most
damaging factor leading to the precarious position of many
Malaysian firms was over-borrowing.
Over-borrowing created a false sense of euphoria in which
caution was thrown to the winds. As one national leader notes,
people thought the "good days wit never end."
Risk analysis is terrible. There were several weaknesses in
the risk analysis:
* According to one critic, the risk should have been
recognised, as much of the borrowing goes to capital
development with no clear signs that productive revenue could
service the borrowing;
* The estimations of productive revenues were often dubious as
all sorts of unrealistic projected demands were made. That
resulted in the over-supply of several types of properties;
* In some projects, revenues were inflated and costs minimised
to present attractive but dubious project papers to the bank;
* The lack of caution in risk analysis also shows up in
unwise, or rather, uncontrolled expenditures. Many
unnecessary things were bought. For when the economic crisis
hit, you could see the lines of repossessed cars being put up
for sale; and
* More seriously, some projects had no adequate cost control.
So, many huge projects manifested serious cost overruns which
threatened their financial viability.
Sun Tzu agrees with those who have highlighted and warned of
poor risk analysis.
He wins his battles by making no mistakes (in risk analysis).
Making no mistake establishes the certainty Or victory.
Now let us look at the elements in the military art. First,
measurement; second, calculation; third, quantification;
fourth, comparison; and fifth, victory.
Measurement comes from earth; calculation from measurement;
quantification from calculation; comparison from
quantification; victory from quantification. (Sun Tzu 4:13,
17-18.)
No project can have lasting endurance if there are no strong
fundamentals.
|