>> MIM Speaks
MODIFYING THE BEHAVIOUR OF BUSINESS
APRIL 26, 1998 -
THE STAR
RESEARCH shows that the brain has three basic components-the
anatomy (the organ itself), the physiology (the inter
connections within the brain and outside the brain to the
other parts of the body), and the behaviour.
These three components function interdependently and in
response to internal (the memory system) and external stimuli
(the environment).
Similarly, in the business world, there are three components -
the structural aspects (such as regulatory bodies), the
connectivity and interrelationships that make up the dynamics
of the business as depicted, for example, in Porters' Model
(the physiology), and the behaviour.
So, too, in an organisation, we have the structure (anatomy),
the work processes and reporting hierarchy (the physiology),
and profit and loss (behaviour).
The anatomy could be refereed to as the hardware, physiology
as the software, and behaviour as the output. These three
components are affected by the surrounding events that impact
our behaviour, and our behaviour, in turn, modifies the
existing physiology and the structure.
The resultant response to current events will influence our
response to future events (just like habits setting in). The
response is dependent on the information received, how it is
processed and the meaning that is derived from it.
For example, in recent months we have all talked and heard
about the effects of the exchange rate and the performance of
the share market. How are the two interrelated and what does
it mean for us in an organisation?
The concept of management, be it strategic planning, MBO, TQM,
BPR and so on, must address all the three components and the
events that bear upon them. Overlooking one or more of the
three components may mean failure to fully realise their
objectives.
Take the case of business process re-engineering. In
delayering the organisation, we may have under- estimated the
powerful underlying influence of the informal physiology which
could produce an emergent strategy that will derail the
original initiatives.
In changing the processes, there must be an accompanying
change of mindset for the new process to work as the two parts
(the process and the mindset) are part of the anatomy but
connected physiologically.
Take another case of the economic scenario in Malaysia. The
volatile unfavourable exchange rates have driven profits down,
reevaluated projects from sustainable to unsustainable, and
created an outflow or withdrawal of foreign funds from the
region.
Businesses and organisations began to behave erratically. In
response, the regulatory bodies changed the rules (the
structure), and harnessed support from overseas and regional
partners (the physiology).
The response from these regulatory bodies brought a new
meaning to the current events and restored confidence somewhat
in the market.
The behaviour of consumers, organisations and industries
sobered up and stabilised. This strategic response addressed
all three components and modified the behaviour of businesses.
Whether the relationships of the various components are static
or dynamic will to some extent determine our approach in
strategic thinking.
If the relationships are static (as in the case of a formal
bureaucratic work environment), then a synthesis or
reductionist approach can apply.
For example, at the bank's frontline office, we can look at
customer service delivery from a reductionist or a synthesis
approach.
In a reductionist approach, we try to understand why the
customers are not happy and we identify the long queues at the
counter as a reason. The solution then would be to open up
more counters.
In a synthesis approach, we look at total customer
requirements and related problems. We will then come up with
possibly one solution to tackle several problems at the slime
time.
For example, we could introduce telebanking and the concept of
partnership banking as per the Hong Kong Bank advertisement.
This would reduce long queues at counters, the customer need
not come to the bank and he could call the bank at his own
convenience. Furthermore, the number of counters at the bank
may even be reduced to save cost.
Thus, in a synthesis approach, we look at all the related
components in order to come up with the big picture and have a
total solution.
If the relationships are dynamic, they could be either stable
or chaotic. In a stable economic environment, the trust fund
manager could apply systems thinking to ascertain how best to
optimise the portfolios under him and to minimise the risk
exposure.
However, if the monetary and economic environment is
unpredictable as in the volatile exchange rate environment,
then the relationship could be chaotic. Quantum thinking would
be required in order to come out of the chaos.
Our response could be short term (in which case, it is deemed
to be operational in nature) or for the long term (strategic).
A short-term response is merely a day-to-day adjustment to the business
environment or to the organisation's immediate needs.
When the response is meant to be long term, then we need to
relook at the basic assumptions of our business or our theory
of the business - what are we in business for.
The purpose of strategic thinking is to open up the options so
that we can choose our strategy and respond accordingly
instead of just reacting.
Extraordinary people visualise not what is possible or
probable but rather what is impossible. And by visualising
what is impossible, they begin to see it as possible.
Dr Amin Khan from Malaysia Air lines will lead a three-day
seminar on "Are You a Strategic Thinker?" at the MIM from May
6 to 8. The seminar is based on a Socratic learning approach
and will be interactive and person alised.
|