>> MIM Speaks
DEVELOPING IN LINE WITH VISION 2020
DEC 21, 1997 -
THE STAR
By Tarcisius Chin
SINCE Vision 2020 was first mooted in 1991, there has been
strong confidence that we will fulfil our national aspiration
of achieving full development status. This confidence had been
reinforced by continuing economic prosperity with growth rates
in excess of the average annual 7% projected to secure the
vision.
The present economic turmoil leading to a downward revision of
next year's growth rate to between 4% and 5% has dented our
confidence, and our competence to fulfil our vision is being
questioned.
Fortunately, our economic fundamentals are strong. But we have
to make sure that these fundamentals continue to remain strong
by eliminating wastage, reducing unproductive projects,
increasing savings and investments, and returning to behaviour
that puts a premium on thrift and prudence and frowns on
conspicuous consumption.
We survived the mid-1980s recession. We should be able to
handle this economic slowdown, provided we have learnt from
the experience of the 80s.
In the last recession, the pain extended to massive
retrenchment by most organisations. We are better positioned
this time with a layer of fat of over one million migrant
workers.
At a review of Vision 2020 early this year, the clear message
transmitted was that we were on target on the economic front,
and we should now have the maturity to recognise-that economic
upturns will follow downturns.
We should have the wisdom to resist the temptation to
surrender to a national psychosis of impending disaster.
I believe that if we take steps to toughen ourselves to face
the challenge, we should have every confidence that our
economic aspirations will materialise.
What is more difficult to fulfil is the social equation of
Vision 2020. The review of Vision 2020 early this year also
transmitted a second message - that we are way behind in
achieving the nine challenges that specify the terms upon
which we embrace development.
There are essentially three pathways to meet the nine
challenges. One pathway addresses the need to develop the
Malaysian who is progressive, scientific and technology
biased.
Another is to develop the caring, tolerant and united
Malaysian society. The third pathway is to develop the moral,
ethical and spiritual Malaysian.
These are universal attributes promoted by religions and
philosophers. They call for the creation of the civil society
and Vision 2020 is less of a destination and more a continuing
journey towards all that is good in Man.
The first pathway is easier to, pave. The ingredient is IQ.
We have already accepted the notion that the development of IQ
amounts to ensuring personal economic prosperity.
This relationship is reinforced in the family and through
educational processes. Hence we strive after paper
qualifications. The danger, however, is the misleading
perception that the only goal of education is to obtain the
highest grades to the exclusion of non-academic pursuits.
We should be wise enough to observe-that the most successful
people are not necessarily the individuals with the highest
academic scores in early life. Tunku Abdul Rahman, Winston
Churchill and many other leaders were not academically smart,
but their contributions have been enormous.
What then are the determinants of their success?
The ingredient that makes some of our great people-is
emotional intelligence (EQ). This has been the essence of the
Asian culture, founded on concepts of community, consensus and
relationship.
It seems ironic that the West has only recently discovered
that EQ is important and is claiming ownership of the insight,
when in Asia the practice of ringgi in Japan, gotong-royong in
Malaysia and clan support in Chinese communities, suggest that
EQ has been part of our heritage.
We have unconsciously neglected the second pathway. In
Yesteryears, extra-curricular activities in schools and
universities were encouraged and many of our political,
business and community leaders were presidents and office
bearers of student unions and related bodies.
Developing a caring, tolerant and united nation has to be
anchored on the ingredient of EQ. IQ does not guarantee
fulfilment in these areas; often IQ develops arrogance,
distance and a sense of superiority, qualities that are
anathema to building the civil society.
The third pathway of creating a moral and ethical society is
now a contemporary concern, and the vital ingredient to
develop integrity has to be spiritual intelligence (SQ). In a
secular sense, SQ refers to values developed through character
formation from young. The danger is the increasing worship of
materialism without concern for the means taken to achieve it.
Incompetence, dishonesty, patronage, bribery and corruption
must be rooted out. This can only be effectively done if we
build on the core values that have been the essence of
religions most Malaysians subscribe to.
Every religion preaches good behaviour, not to cheat, steal,
kill or injure others. We know where to draw the line-
unfortunately some live the rituals of religion without living
the substance of our beliefs.
Developing good values must be done early in life. The route
has to be by deed, not words. Character formation has to begin
with the home, through school and into our career. Our faith
and hope lie with the new generation.
The deviant behaviour of the older generation has to be curbed
by law and social sanction. Legal restraints on wrong
behaviour can only seek to impose minimal standards. Even
capital punishment for serious drug offences, for example, has
not deterred wrongdoers.
The only real safeguard we have in creating a moral and
ethical society is the substance of inner defence, the stuff
of missionaries and personal conviction. This is the most
difficult pathway because of moral choices. It is becoming
even more difficult when society itself places an increasingly
high value on materialism.
Nearly every Malaysian mouths the commitment to Vision 2020.
The perception is that by the year 2020 we will be living life
like the Americans or the Japanese. What is often missed is
that the journey is going to be difficult and will require the
continuing commitment, unwavering support and behavioural
change of all Malaysians to create the Malaysian with
intelligence, interpersonal skills and social values.
If we walk through the wisdom of the ages we become acutely
aware of the seeds of decay and destruction when we lose sight
of the larger purpose of human civilisation.
I am reminded of the idealism of my youth best described in
the philosophy "What does it profit a man if he gains the
whole world and suffers the loss of his own soul?" I am also
influenced by the Rotary dictum "He profits most who serves
best."
The passage to Vision 2020 is to meet the challenge of
transforming us and, consequently, our society. Our legacy to
the new generation has less to do with economic wealth and
more with quality of life.
The pathways through IQ, EQ and SQ development are
interrelated and provide a distinct and useful framework to
map out the initiatives and steps that can be consciously
introduced at different levels of home, school and
professional experiences.
Nearly a quarter of the time period available to us to
transform society has passed. We need to take corrective
action to ensure the dream of vision 2020 will be a reality.
We have to be more conscious of what still needs to be done.
Any vision has to be communicated, shared and managed. Along
the way, new forces may reshape the vision. We may, for
instance, be now more acutely concerned with environment
degradation, an issue that may call for a 10th challenge in
our drive towards development.
Above all, for a vision to work it has to be living-not as
slogans that sound nice but as a benchmark of our own
individual behaviour. After all, the powerful movements all
began with the conviction and example of an individual.
|