>> MIM Speaks
RECIPE FOR A HIGH-PERFORMANCE TEAM
OCT 12, 1997 -
THE STAR
MOST of us are quite aware that high-performance teams are
rare. One might say they are as rare as highly successful
organisations.
But if we take a moment to ponder, we might say that this
analogy is rather unfair. And most people would agree with you
if you argue that it is much easier to build a
high-performance team than a highly successful organisation.
In any case, if you are thinking of building a high
performance team you might want to consider the following
approaches suggested by Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith in
their book The Wisdom of Teams.
Sense Of Urgency
WITHOUT a sense of urgency, team members seldom strive hard
enough to achieve a high standard of performance.
This is where top management support and presence is important
to ensure that a right `sense of urgency' is communicated to
the team members.
Unfortunately, top management seldom bother itself with
problems that are not pressing enough. Workers therefore learn
from experience that projects which do not receive top
management's attention, are unimportant ones and therefore, no
one need to bother about!
Good leaders know instinctively a sense of urgency affects the
overall commitment of team members. With the help from senior
managers, team leaders must communicate the importance of the
team's tasks to the members and obtain their commitment.
Equally important to establishing a sense of urgency is the
setting of a level of performance standard the is to be
accomplished. In the workplace, it is not an easy thing to
determine such a level.
It is easy to theorise that the expected perfor mance level
should be high enough to stimulate a sense of challenge, but
not so high that it demoralises the members and lead to
remarks such as, 'How can we achieve a 40 per cent cost
reduction in three months?' Each team leader must decide the
expected performance level for his team.
Skill-Based Member selection
MOST work groups ultimately fail to deliver because of the
belief that friendship among members is more important than
other factors.
It is, therefore, common to find that animosity replaces
friendship the moment someone is taken to task for shoddy
work.
Team members Should be selected based on three factors. They
are ad) technical or functional capabilities, be) conceptual
or skills in problem solving and decision making, and a)
interpersonal skills which cover a broader space than merely
`friendship'.
Studies show that most team member are capable of requiring
new skills if they are committed to the teams purpose and
goals. That is to say, most of us have-the capacity for
personal growth and the ability to develop the required
technical conceptual and in terpersonal skills if we are
properly guided.
Most high-performance teams consist of members with
complementery technical effective problem solving abilities
and the right `give' and take attitude.
Importance Of First Meeting
FIRST impressions always mean a lot.
At the first meeting, everyone is watchful of the signals (or
lack of signals) given by others. Attention is particularly
focused at those in positions of au thority. It is here that
team leaders and senior manager(s) representing top management
must communicate the right message (such as the urgency of the
problem or task) to the team members. It is during the first
meeting that the seriousness of the task force or project team
must be communicated across.
Unfortunately most-team leaders miss the opportunity to build
a high-performence team by sending the wrong signals. Instead
of being serious, team members get the impression that the
project team is a fun group instead of a high performance
team. All too often, once the wrong image is created a more
effective remedial action is to replace the team leader!
Setting Clear Rules
ALL real teams develop rules of behaviour or conduct that help
then achieve their common purpose and performance goals.
Examples of some of these rules are:
* attendance must be punctual and compulsory;
* discussions will be open, frank and professional;
* facts will take precedence over opinions;
* only what had been agreed by all are allowed to be made
public;
* everyone gets a fair distribution of real work; and,
* no finger-pointing.
Once the rules are formally adopted they should not be broken.
And when they do occur, appropriate punitive actions should be
taken against the guilty party.
If punishment is not meted out soon enough, the entire group's
credibility is at stake. Usually the team members will lose
confidence on the leader right to lead.
Take for example the rule on total confidentiality to
encourage open and frank discussion. Anyone who violates the
rule by talking to outsiders about matters that should be kept
confidential must be rep rimanded by the team leader.
Otherwise future discussion will not be open and uninhibited.
Celebrate Achieved Performence Targets
IN order to forge team spirit, team leaders must celebrate
successful achievement of performance targets or goals with
all the members taking part in it.
Examples of events that are worth celebrating are:
* achievement of a 30 per cent increase in production output
in six months;
* sizeable reduction in wastage rates;
* achievement of on-time delivery targets when every
department in the company is working under pressure;
* more satisfied customer as measured by a reduction in the
number of complaints, and so on.
It would be penny wise pound foolish for team leaders to try e
frugal and therefore refrain from spending small sum of money
to forge a spirit of togetherness among team members. We must
recognise that the potential energy in a closely-knit team far
surpasses the money spent for the celebration!
For any `celebration' to be meaningful the achieved
performance targets must contain a `stretch' component. If it
does not, the performance target lacks challenge and
therefore, there is really nothing to celebrate.
Spend Lots Of Time Together
FEW work groups become real teams without spending lob of time
together, both formally and informally.
Yet many team leaders fail to realise that such personal
bonding, creative insight and team energies grow out of
constant interactions among members both during scheduled
meetings as well as unscheduled get-togethers.
When team members spend time together many productive
activities such as:
* problem analysis;
* debating issues and choosing from among various
alternatives;
* brainstorming and generating new and better ideas, and so
on, can take place.
Top management and team leaders-nead to realise that
extraordinary achievements can only come from teams that spend
lob of time together formulation strategies and approaches to
achieve the common purpose and goals.
Give Positive Reinforcements
WITH very few exceptions, everyone responds well to positive
feedbacks, recognition or words of praise and reward.
Because there are many ways to give positive feed back, to
recognise and reward team performance, it is really up to the
leader and his team to come up with positive reinforcement
that are meaningful and will be treasured or appreciated by
the recipients.
Again unfortunately it is not uncommon to hear recipients (of
positive reinforcements) complain that what they received are
of little value or use to them.
Under ouch situations, if only the people involved
(particularly the team leader) put some consider action into
what is appropriate reward for whom, the outcome would be
win-win situations for all.
Conclusion
BEFORE an ordinary work group becomes a high-performance team
it must go through much trials and tribulations.
The above seven approaches real teams experience is no
guarantee that the recipe will succeed in helping potential
teams move up the performance curve.
As authors Katzenbach and Smith put it, team building involves
all sorts of risks. For instance:
* abandoning the command/control model risks team instability;
* releasing the tight control is to risk performance;
* acknowledging responsibility for self-improvement is self
esteem risk; and,
* encouraging an open and free for all kind of discussion
exposes team leaders to risks such as emotional outbursts,
interpersonal conflict and so on.
Therefore, for teams to go through such risks makes sense only
if it unleashes the team's potential capabilities and be able
to achieve levels of performance that are much higher than the
sums of inputs from individual members.
|