>> MIM Speaks
LEADERS FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM
JUNE 22, 1997 -
THE STAR
By Dr Tarcisius Chin
AS we move towards the next mil lennium, the new managemenr
article of faith is leadership with a growing band of apostles
preach ing the faith.
Research into the subject leading to the publication of books
and articles as well as volumes of unpublished conference and
seminar papers suggests that developing leadership for the
21st century is the key to wealth creation and prosperity for
the future.
What has happened to the notion of management as the critical
factor of production? Is it a name change? Is it a loss of
faith in the ability of management to contribute to the wealth
creation process?
Why the urgency to treat the subject of leadership as separate
and distinct from management?
Dr Warren Bennis of the University of Southern California
makes the distinction that managers do things right while
leaders do the right things.
This is comparable to Peter Drucker's distinction between
efficiency and effectiveness. On a broader canvass it is the
distinction between means and ends.
The classic definition of management is "deciding what has to
be done and getting it done through others." Leadership has
been defined in different ways, but its essence is based on
three components.
First is a vision of the desired future; second the ability to
get a following; and third the competence m securing the
future.
The closeness of the definitions between management and
leadership suggests the existence of a high degree of
commonality in the expectations and requirements of management
and leadership. The departure is in the degree of emphasis.
Leaders devote more time and energy to "looking forward" (the
planning function of management) while managers tend to be
more involved with operational tasks (making it happen).
It is accepted orthodoxy that it is top management's key role
to behave as leaders, devoting more attention to creating the
future while lower-level managers attend to the day-to-day
concerns of running the business.
But it is also increasingly accepted that the core attributes
of good leadership should be developed right across the
managerial spectrum and that future business will be driven by
managers of all ranks who are leaders rather than followers.
Leadership is, therefore becoming the sine qua non of the
future manager.
In a recent survey by the Economist Intelligence Unit, with
the cooperation of Koto/Ferry International, of over 150
senior executives from many of the world's leading
corporations, the message conveyed "that business in much of
developed still pays too much attention to the search for
charismatic leadership, rather than engaging in the more
difficult but less chancy task of permitting and developing
leadership throughout its organisations."
The urgency for leadership development is based on the need
for empowerment and quick response time in an environment
where product life-cycles have shortened, competition
intensified and corporations globalised.
The observation made is that tomorrow's organisations will be
managed by a team of leaders in an environment which will
demand that businesses must enhance entire processes, not just
individual functions; only a team of leaders, knowledgeable
about both individual processes and overall corporate goals
can achieve this effect.
In a recent conferring speech by Dr Jacques Nasser, President
of Automotive Operations of the Ford Motor Company, when he
received the Doctorate of Technology from RMIT (a partner of
the Malaysian Institute of Management for the Institute's
degree programmes), the significant importance of leadership
is emphasised.
To Dr. Nasser, leadership contains six elements:
One, leadership requires the strength of conviction.
Two, leaders must have the ability to truly listen.
Three, leaders demonstrate simplicity as a means of building
confidence.
Four, leaders do not hesitate to make tough decisions.
Five, leaders celebrate achievement.
Six, leaders understand that leadership requires optimism.
Good leadership generates "follower ship" people willing to
follow the leaders because they believe that the leader has
their best interests at heart.
But good leadership also demands a level of personal
involvement. Some call it enthusiasm, commitment, excitement.
Like Confucius, Tom Peters and Dr Nasser, I prefer to use the
expression "passion" a feeling about doing our best simply
because we love doing it.
As the veil of differences between management and leadership
is removed in our aspiration to transform every manager into a
leader and to reposition the role of leadership as the
centrepoint of management, the challenge of developing
management leaders for the 21st century is a daunting
exercise.
The transformation requires nothing less than a radical change
in the current thinking of management education and training
providers.
The conventional focus on disciplines must give way to a
refocus on developing the full person, beginning with self
assessment and ending with issues relating to the individual's
contribution to the betterment of society.
The disciplines are the means towards a much nobler end and
should be viewed in the context of the appropriate
technological support to create the desired future.
|