>> MIM Speaks
JOB-HOPPING DOESN'T ALWAYS PAY BETTER
JUNE 08, 1997 -
THE STAR
By S. Hadi Abdullah
OUR country is experiencing a fast pace of growth with
multiple projects on-stream. In this tight labour market,
people are being paid more than their real value while staff-
pinching is common.
There is a need for employers and employees to look again at
these issues.
International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Rafidah
Aziz has advised the young to look for job satisfaction and
not keep on job-hopping.
M. Zain Majid of the Malaysian Employers Federation is
concerned that salary increases are "not matching
productivity." This is not good for the economy in the long
run. We already see some companies moving overseas, while
others talk of further mechanisation.
Another development is the individualistic nature of our
supervisors and managers. Students in my class (practising
managers) say they will work for the person who pays the most.
Among the candidates for the Tun Abdul Razak Youth Leadership
Programme recently were those who had held five different jobs
in the last five years.
These young job-hoppers do not learn sufficiently from their
present jobs before moving to another. Senior managers
complain that some of the young people have moved so fast that
they do not know much about the current job they were holding.
The sad fact is that these people are spending most of their
time covering their incompetencies.
While a good salary is important, meney should not be the sole
criterion. Some sense of belonging, a feel for what your
organization is doing, perhaps the relationships you have
built, even training younger executives, should be factors to
consider.
Top managers and CEOs, on the other hand, must look at their
work-force as parents would do their children. Employers must
want the best for their workers, be patient and encouraging;
help them build on their strengths; teach them new things,
praise them when a job is done wey. In short, they should
strive at being caring and concerned.
They must also ensure that young staff members are given
challenging jobs so that they thirst for "conquest" and have a
sense of achievement. Employers should provide freedom and
empowerment. The boss should not interfere all the time, and
should know when to let go.
The workplace itself must be conducive. The headquarters of
Jan Carlzon was only three levels high but had a swimming pool
and coffee house which gave it a casual ambience. According to
Ikujuro Nonaka, professor of knowledge at University of
California, Berkeley, this casualness helps improve
productivity and creativity.
Staff should be given the opportunity to take part in projects
out-side their normal work area. This would give them a change
and at the same time help them see things from a different
perspective.
The boss should ensure that there is no favouritism and should
be as objective as possible by obtaining different view points
or listening to both sides of the story.
At the same time, bosses should not hesitate to haul up "black
sheep," tell them where they fall short, and perhaps transfer
them to a more suitable job. The "chopping block" should be
the last resort.
Says Tan Sri Konusuke Matsushita: "More important than
competence is aptitude and assigning him a job accordingly is
a major management responsibility."
Some Asian thinkers like Gaby Mendoza say the individualistic
nature of Westerners is one reason for their dismal
performance in business today. He says Asians should build on
their nature of caring for others, teamwork, gotong-royong,
loyalty and paternalism.
Douglas McGregor, the MIT scholar, said many years ago that
"paternalism has become a nasty word, but it is by na means a
defunct management philosophy."
It would be good for our young to think as much of the future
as the present. Harold Geneen of AT&T had said that in his
early years of employment he went for experience and knowledge
more than the salary because learning about the job, the
company and its people was very important.
He was prepared to acquire this experience even if it meant
that he could be "lagging" behind his friends in the short
run. In the later part of his life, money and position came
easily. He used the experience, discipline and knowledge to
make his company grow ten-fold.
In a study on general managers some years ago, Prof John
Kotter of Harvard University concluded that a successful
manager usually grew up in one organization. A good example
would be Jack Welch who spent over 20 years with General
Electric.
Kotter's recent study on MBA graduates shows the same trend,
with one difference - many of them are starting their own
businesses. Thus, constant movement works against one's best
interest.
Yes, we should work hard, seek fair compensation, move up the
corporate ladder and enjoy the fruits of honest labour. What
is worrying is that we nmay be too concerned with what we can
get at the shortest possible time.
|