>> MIM Speaks
A WAY FORWARD FOR YOUNGER STAFF
MAY 11, 1997 -
THE STAR
By S. Hadi Abdullah
COMPANIES are experimenting with ways to update, guide, advise
and retain its workforce. One method that companies are
adopting is known as mentoring.
Mentoring is nothing new it is perhaps as old as history
itself. We have commonly heard of guru, si-fu and mentor.
Confucius, Lao Tze, Socrates and Plato of old had many
proteges learning and seeking advice from them.
The word "mentoring" itself is of Greek origin. Literally
translated, it means "to remember, think, counsel." Therefore,
a mentor would be somebody who provides wise counsel, thus
helping his or her mentee (protege) to grow.
Mentoring has taken different forms. The old method of doing
it would be for the mentee to follow the si-fu or guru and
learn from observing, questioning and emulating his mentor.
There could be occasions when mentees-were told to perform a
certain task without being told the reason for doing it. The
mentees were expected to learn from experience or told to
perform a task repeatedly before the moral of the story was
related to them.
Nowadays, the relationship is less of reverence; at times it
is seen as mutually beneficial.
Some companies make it a point to separate the manager/boss
and the mentor. That is they are two different persons. This
is the more traditional approach. Others feel that the
managers themselves can act as the mentors, thus playing a
dual role.
The methods chosen would depend on the maturity and corporate
culture of the organisation. The former method of mentoring
is clearly seen in the diagram.
The manager focuses on results staff performance, deadlines,
budgets, standards and maintenance of team spirit. The mentor
on the other hand focuses on the learner and his/her
development, career aspirations, needs, ambition, etc.
As shown in the diagram, both the manager and the mentor
involve themselves in active listening, coaching, counselling,
decision-making and other such activities.
In the latter method, the manager or boss plays all these
roles put together. It could be a daunting task but many
people have been able to do it. The method where the roles are
separated is preferred because the mentee could have some
inhibition relating private matters to his or her mentor. This
takes into cognisance the fact that today's youth face enough
problems, both in and outside the office.
Consultant William Gray relates that almost all participants
in his time when they needed mentoring and no one stepped
forward to provide it.
Management gurus say that mentoring would take a more
important role today, with the flattening and delayering of
organisations."Employers and organisations are not offering
the kind of security and caretaking that they used to,
therefore mentoring is seen as an alternative to that," says
Kathleen Kram of Boston School of Management.
Rosabeth Moss Kanter of Harvard University has concluded that
"having a mentor is critical to one's career success."
Mentoring is more focused towards newcomers who need to be
quickly introduced to the company's culture and way of doing
things.
Reg Hamilton says: "Mentoring is a way of helping another
understand more fully and learn more comprehensively from
their day-today experience. It works best when it is a
confidential relationship which gives the learner the
opportunity to speak freely about their concerns."
A good example of mentoring is that practiced by General
Electric (GE) of America. The programme grew out of efforts
made to integrate minorities and women at GE subsidiaries. The
goal was to create a climate that was "inclusive."
In 1995, G.E. had more than 1,000 mentors or pairs. It was
most successful at their appliance manufacturing factory at
Louisville, Kentucky. Here, 300 pairs work on this programme.
There is nothing hard and fast about it, some pairs meet
often, others do not. In one case the pair met five times a
week, then had a lapse of a few months, and then met again two
to three times a week. It is an informal set-up that seems to
be working.
British Airways ranks among the world's most successful
airlines (profit of US$684 million in 1995 the second highest
in the world). It wanted to improve the quality of its
training but faced a temporary shortage of management people.
Therefore, the airline turned to mentoring.
Trainees kept in touch with their study supervisors who were
assigned to them early in their career. They met and advised
each other on how best to "enter" and learn from a certain
department. In addition, the trainees as a group met for
specific training like report writing.
The mentors also participated as part of the
"self-development" training programme. The mentors for this
particular scheme were young managers on the move. The company
felt that their experience would have a maturing and
beneficial effect. The managers chosen had good interpersonal
skills and were also given training in counselling skills.
Richard Pascle and Anthony G. Athos talk of the Sempai-Kohai
(Senior-Junior) relationship in Japanese companies. They say:
"Corresponding to the mentor-protege relationship in the West,
it is probably one of the most constructive forces for
productive and harmonious working relationships in Japanese
companies. The Japanese have made an institution of it."
The Japanese emphasise and focus on relationship rather than
on each individual and his role. The relationship has both
emotional and functional ties. Senior and junior are seen as
inescapably linked one's failure or success necessarily
affects the other. It is not hierarchical but something that
binds both parties.
One's Sempai is usually outside of one's direct reporting
relationships, thus acting more like a godfather. However, it
is noted that it does influence the direct boss-subordinate
relationship.
The Sempai expects his Kohai to understand him and compensate
for him when needed. Their relationship goes on till the Kohai
himself becomes a Sempai. Thus new recruits are given a
helping hand, introduced to the company culture and the way
things are done in the organisation.
Among Malaysian companies practising mentoring are Shell
Malaysia and Malaysian Institute of Management. MIM introduced
an informal mentoring system about three years ago, with
senior staff members acting as mentors. It is a voluntary
system, where mentees choose their own mentors.
The system, although informal and loosely run, has benefited a
number of younger people who have taken steps to acquire
higher quatifications, broaden their horizons and are in the
midst of fast-traking. The organisation is now taking steps to
involve more younger staff and newcomers into this system.
Mentoring, according to Eric Gunn, must have the full support
of top management. Besides, the programme should be open to
all members of the staff.
Both mentors and proteges should be told what to expect, which
could involve some training. The programme should communicate
in no uncertain terms that it does not guarantee a promotion.
Lastly, the selection criteria for mentors should be made
clear to all.
Companies like Cadbury's of England have been practising
mentoring for centuries, in developing their young for career
progression. Likewise, family-owned companies in Malaysia.
Lately, Tun Daim Zainuddin's mentees have been making waves in
the Malaysian scene.
Organisations can adopt this system to "break" new staff,
fast-track them, give them the benefit of a senior staff's
wisdom, and at the same time retain them for their own good
and the organisation's.
|