>> MIM Speaks
GET SUPPORT BEFORE VOICING OBJECTION
MAY 11, 1997 -
NEW STRAITS TIMES
AFTER serving Atlas Rotary for 24 years, Derek, 48, resigned
as QC manager, in a moment of anger. It pained him to think
that this was his first job. He also realised that it was
folly on his part to believe that loyalty and commitment in
his employer was the right thing to do.
What triggered Derek to resign was the announcement by his MD
that he (Derek) will be transferred to Ho Chi Mink City as the
QC manager of the newly set up operation.
In Derek's mind, the root cause of his troubles is the MD's
secretary. Jennifer. During a management meeting, Derek spoke
out against appointing Jennifer the new personal manager when
the post fell vacant. All the other department heads kept an
uneasy silence as they did not dare to offend Jennifer, who
happens to have an extraordinary relationship with the MD and
also notorious for her vindictive character.
So, even after her appointment as personnel manager, Jennifer
schemed against Derek, his department and his suppliers. The
last straw for Derek was the announcement of transfer to
Vietnam.
Question: If you had to advise a young man or woman so that he
or she does not get into the situation Derek finds himself,
how would you do it?
# LOH WOOILIP, of Boustead Shipping Agencies, Kuala Lumpur,
writes:
DEREK, as QC manager at Atlas Rotary, has failed in the
following ways:
1. He under-estimated the influence Jennifer has over the MD,
or has been unaware of the negative actions Jennifer is
capable of taking. He realised the latter only too late to do
anything. So, out of frustration he resigned.
2. He was insensitive to social politics that takes place in
organisations all the time. For instance, all the other
department heads were careful not to offend Jennifer as they
are well aware of her vindictive character.
3. By speaking out openly against Jennifer during a management
meeting, Derek had singled himself out for vengeful acts by
Jennifer.
What Derek should have done was:
1. As QC manager, he should minute down his subordinates
feedback. For example, when Johnny confided in Derek that
'some people in the personnel department were making life very
unpleasant" for him Derek should raise this issue during
regular department meeting.
We can assume that with his loyalty and commitment to the
company, he (Derek) will get Es subordinates' support when he
take steps to be protective of them in this particular case,
Johnny. And should the "trouble-mak continue to harass or
irritate Jo Johnny, Derek should then bring the mat ter up
with the factory manager.
2. After confirming that Jennifer is behind those irritating
acts Derek should get the factory managers' help i dealing
with the problem. The crux d the matter here is that Derek
should call for the co-operation, support and unity of as many
colleagues as possible to deal with Jennifer.
Loh believes that if he had the co-operation and support of
the other department managers to voice their objection to the
appointment of Jennifer as their new personnel manager then
the MD would not be able to single out Derek for punitive
actions. In fact, if the management team speaks in one voice,
the MD would not HA supporting Jennifer and watch his
organisation "split up" just because of one person.
In conclusion I would advise those Who are young not to be so
naive as Derek. On the other hand, Derek's naivete may be the
outcome of his lack of exposure as Atlas Rotary was his first
employer and his career growth had been smooth all those 24
years.
# JIMMY TING, retired corporate executive, writes:
DEREK'S resignation was very impulsive. Even assuing he is
financially independent, few professional men his age would do
such a drastic thing.
Based on my personal experience, individuals such as Derek
will have reason for regret after they cool down. And if they
do not get another job quickly, they will become very
remorseful and bitter.
Unfortunately, many experiences in life can only be learnt
through painful experiences. In this context, those who have
suf fared hardship early in their working life will learn to
be more realistic. They learn that loyalty to an organisation
is often misplaced.
A more practical form d loyalty (though not without its risks)
is loyalty to those in power. As a general rule, learn to
tread carefully in the political minefields of an
organisation.
Self-centred manager told to put factory back in order
CASE STUDY:
GAVIN, 36, the factory manager of TCP, was sitting in his
office in Petaling Jaya, staring out of the window. The clock
on the wall read 5.15pm.
He had just got back after a short but very unpleasant
encounter with Lawrence, the manufacturing director of a large
multi-industry corporation in Kuala Lumpur.
About two hours ago, Gavin received a rough rub-down for the
poor financial performance of the factory headed by him. The
more Gavin tried to defend his actions, the more he got shot
down. And just before he left the boss's room, Lawrence
warned: "You better make amends quickly or else ...."
Company Background
IN early 1994, Takcos Cement Products Sdn Bhd was acquired by
BRX Berhad, a well-established local conglomerate. TCP, a
manufacturer of prestressed and precast concrete products was
set up more than 15 years ago.
During the past eight years, the plant had enjoyed healthy
profits and seen expansions in line with the buoyant
construction industry.
Prior to Gavin's appointment as factory manager in mid-1995,
TCP had a work culture that can generally be described as
cordial and co-operative. To outsiders, the relationship
between management and staff appeared easy-going.
But work gets done. This was reflected in the consistent
achievement of the targeted annual production. And whenever
there were periods of exceptional high demand, the managers
and workers worked closely together to deliver the goods.
So, there was much camaraderie among the department managers
and mutual respect between the managers and workers. They have
grown to know each other very well over the 15 years and
because of the positive work climate, absenteeism and staff
turnover is very low.
Many factories in the neighbourhood were envious of TCP's
achievement in this respect as they had to deal with high
rates of resignations and absenteeism.
The New Environment
LESS than half a year after Gavin took charge of TCP, things
slowly started to change. Being ambitious, impatient and
selfcentred, Gavin was not too happy with TCP's output,
managerial style, control measures and so on.
He felt that the overall performance and profit position of
TCP could be increased by 10 to 15 per cent if he were to run
a tighter ship.
What basically he had in mind was to institute tighter
controls over expenditure, wastage, set higher production
targets on a quarterly basis, etc.
So, in January 1996, during a meeting involving managers from
the sales, production, engineering, administration and
accounting, and logistics departments, Gavin confidently
announced his plans.
Not unexpectedly, the various managers looked at each other.
When the more outgoing engineering manager voiced his views,
Gavin replied: "I have been here only six months and almost
all of you have been here since the factory started, I can see
much latent potential in our people.
"With proper management, and stricter control measures over
small issues such as punctuality, duration of tea and lunch
breaks and so on, we surely can meet the 10 to 15 per cent
increase in production.
"During the last few months, I have been monitoring our
factory workers' time-use and I can confidently say that if we
make them more disciplined in time management, our new targets
can easily be reached."
Sensing that it was futile to argue against Gavin's
viewpoints, the managers nodded their heads in agreement. And
from then on, TCP's participative management style practised
by Gavin's predecessor was replaced by Gavin's autocratic
style.
By November 1996, not only TCP's work climate took a change in
the opposite direction. Gavin's planned higher output and
reduced production costs did not materialism.
In December, when representatives from the external auditing
company came to do their annual checks, the leader of the
auditing team, Rosalind, sensed the change. The first person
she asked happened to be the production manager. Already in
his mid-50s and with an introverted personality, the manager
just smiled and did not say anything.
Curious, Rosalind took every opportunity to find out something
new about this gloomy work environment. By the time the
auditing assignment was over, she was pretty sure the man
responsible for this negative change was Gavin, a brash
mechanical engineer with an MBA and a personality most TCP
staff would describe as egotistic.
Shelling From Manufacturing Director
IN early January 1997, Lawrence, the manufacturing director in
headquarters, summoned Gavin.
"I have gone through the production statistics and the
statement of accounts and what I see is a rather dismal
picture. Not only output is down, the operating costs have
gone up by eight per cent. Now, I have also had a word with
our human resource manager and I must say I was impressed by
your past 10 years' track records. Tell me what had gone
wrong," said Lawrence.
Gavin tried to be defensive. He narrated briefly his
observation about TCP's latent potential and his plan that
output can be increased and costs reduced with better
management.
The conversation continued with intermittent sharp questioning
from Lawrence. The more Gavin tried to defend his managerial
approach the more Lawrence became agitated.
After 10 minutes, Lawrence remarked: "Are you aware that the
shop-floor workers and the five department heads find you
unreasonable and difficult to work with. one of their main
complaints against you is that you are so self-centred and
therefore insensitive to your people's needs. As the head of
the factory, you have got the factory into this mess. How do
you expect me to explain this situation to my boss?"
After a brief pause, Lawrence continued in a more subdued but
still serious tone: "I know your elder brother well. But work
is work. Corporations succeed by being productive and more
competitive than our rivals. Otherwise, we go out of
business. I will give you six more months.
"By end-June, I want to see TCP's profit and loss and
production performance back to end-1995's figures. And when
that is achieved, you get another six months to show that you
can manage the factory, otherwise ....
Question: If you were Gavin, what would you have to do?
|