>> MIM Speaks
SELF-DIRECTED TEAMS GET THE RESULTS
APRIL 13, 1997 -
THE STAR
By S. Hadi Abdullah
TWO weeks ago, we read about how self-directed teams, Procter
& Gamble at Augusta and the Charmin Paper Company, worked.
Today we will see how this was further developed in Procter &
Gamble, Nissan and Texas Instruments Malaysia.
At the Procter & Gamble plant at Lima, Ohio, self-directed
technician teams were maturing and taking on new dimensions.
One of the conspicuous schemes that were implemented in the
Lima plant was the skilled-based pay system hinging on the
principle that people should be paid according to what they
know and accomplish.
There were five levels, each having a range within it. There
were no fixed numbers to any one of the grades meaning that,
theoretically, all the technicians could attain the top grade.
At Lima, some 185 technicians (60 per cent) were in the top
grade. Technicians moved from one Qualification Block (Q
block) to another, reaching the top grade of General
Technician. Each grade had its own qualification process, and
members were quizzed by fellow teammates before promotion.
On-line means work that is directly related to the product
including its packaging, shipping and so on. Off-line means
jobs outside the above category.
For example, one technician headed a small team, full-time, to
design and find the best ways to manage a diverse workforce.
Another person was made the training Coordinator, which
resulted in his introducing computer controls, laser scanning,
pneumatic controls and others.
Off-line activity ensures that all effort and recommendations
were easily put into effect. For example, there was ownership
in the training Co-ordinators' proposal. It was based on the
experience of a person who knew the work and place.
As a result, it gave confidence on the training activities
besides making them work. However, technicians could not make
a career out of off-line jobs. They had to go back to on-line
work.
The plant at Lima in 1991 had progressed to such an extent
that a senior technician was put in charge of a project "Downy
rebuild" costing US$5 million (RM12.5 million).
The project was to study the savings from packaging and
environmental concerns. The team was allowed to even pick its
own contractors.
Tim Bible and his people accomplished this task in a record 16
weeks. Their awareness of "time to market" was excellent.
Team members were free to "challenge" recommendations from
headquarters. There was a hiring committee composed of
volunteers who had been trained in the field of recruiting.
Before the final appointment, the prospective candidate met
his/her team to get a feel of whether they could work
together.
Yutaka Kume was the president of Nissan in 1985. Things looked
bleak. The organisation had, as he put it, an "inward-looking
bureaucratic culture."
Nissan's domestic share dropped from 33.7 in 1972 to 25.6 per
cent in 1985. Toyota had moved up. The Stanza was a failure in
1981, not being able to attract the young.
Kume modernised the facilities, emphasised research &
development, recruited top students including those from the
University of Tokyo.
He established a team called the Product/Market Strategy Group
which was in charge of the whole process from the designing to
the completion of the car.
One of the products a team was working on was the Nissan
Silvia. The car was targeted for the young who were beginning
to form a large part of the new market. The Silvia team of
young people were full of enthusiasm, pouring their emotions
and feelings into the project.
Unlike other members of Nissan, R&D groups need not come in
uniform; therefore, it was not surprising to see these people
in jeans. They did not have fixed hours of work. So long as
they clocked the necessary weekly hours, they could come and
go anytime they wanted.
This group of young people, whose average age was 28, were
making a car they themselves would want to buy. The company
even allowed them to drive the competitors' cars as an
exception, for them to learn from it.
When they invited Kume to see their clay model, he made no
comment or changes. The car rolled out; with great fanfare, a
10-car caravan left the Kyushu plant, taking 10 days to reach
Tokyo.
Silvia was voted the car of the year. The group sent letters
of gratitude to the original buyers. It outsold its
competitor, Honda's Prelude. There was no top-official role in
this project, the team was "self directed." Crisis had
motivated them.
In a paper presented at a MIM conference, Jerry W. Lee, the
former managing director of Texas Instruments of Malaysia
(TIM), spoke about self-managed teams in his company.
The idea had emerged when Mohd Azmi Abdullah began to discuss
Peter Drucker's concept of self-management: The teams at TIM
are composed of 10 to 15 people, each having a facilitator
assisted by a co-ordinator.
The position of co-ordinator is rotated among the group
members. These self-managed teams share responsibility and
often decide on quality and production matters. They are in
charge of the determination of their own breaks besides
deciding who should use which equipment.
They do not punch in time-cards as work accomplished could be
verified through an honour system. Since this method was
adopted, productivity has improved and factory net profit has
more than doubled.
The worker to supervisor ratio went from 60:1 to 200:1.
Since Jerry Lee's time, TIM has been fine-tuning its
self-managed teams. TIM has a peer appraisal system in which
workers appraise each other, and this is taken into account as
an input in their merit increases.
A large number of members of the team are experienced and
trained. Many of them are mothers some grandmothers. They are
therefore, rightly, treated as "independent adults," says a
senior member of the staff.
TIM is now embarking on a TPM (Total Production Maintenance)
programme. It works at "ownership" of the machines and place
of work leading towards zero-defect zero-breakdown,
zero-accident. As a starter, TIM is working on six model
machines.
This company spends a minimum of 40 hours of training per
person. However, it is common for some to reach as many as 100
hours. Courses are designed by a special team that takes into
consideration suggestions from team members.
Walking into this factory, one is often greeted by smiles and
nods from passing staff. Pictures with the names of successful
teams are hung all along the corridors.
Progress of TPM implementation is for all to see and is
displayed on cards at worksites. Staff are rewarded for zero
absenteeism. Huge boards display team positions at the
canteens.
The staff were celebrating in the canteen their achievement of
the production target when I visited them. The motto "we
commit, we make it" was colourfully displayed.
There has been an overall reduction of payroll and benefits.
There was also a profile shift of professional staff which saw
a reduction in the number of manufacturing supervisory staff
from 79 to 12.
There was expanded job satisfaction and a considerable
reduction in employee turnover. TIM factories now run without
supervisors after six in the evening.
It is no surprise that Charles Monz and Henry Sims in their
book, Business Without Bosses, say this of Texas Instruments
Malaysia: "The plant is one of the best examples in the world
of the planned integration of self-managing work teams into a
TQM environment."
What the above teams did was "directed anatomy." As Waterman
puts it: "Leaders need to define the game, the rules, the
playing field and the boundaries. Then leave it to a
well-chosen and trained team to do things their own way."
We notice that self-directed teams result from top management
commitment, which should work towards breaking down
communication barriers, and hierarchies with managers and
supervisors becoming facilitators and coaches.
The organisation, and especially the teams, will have to
evolve from autocratic to central control and then to
partnership and highly empowered teams.
There is a need to look at "subcultures," says Lisa Gundry of
DePanel University of Chicago, to ascertain whether there is
is collabotion, competition, focus, vision loyalty and values
to build on in the or organisation.
Organisations wanting to excel would build on the above
besides giving teams competitive benefits and lots of room to
self-actualise.
|