>> MIM Speaks
RECRUIT THE RIGHT PEOPLE FOR THE JOB
JAN 12, 1997 -
NEW STRAITS TIMES
By Alex K.B. Yong
SO much has been said lately regarding the importance of
people in organisations and of what they can do. There are
also leaders outside of business who have emphasised why
people form the backbone of national development.
The best organisations are made up of the best people. An
organisation's goals and successes are conceived by its
people, and the very culture and continuity of the
organisation are designed for people to enjoy their work and
produce their best. All these are true.
Have we not been told that money is the most important
resource of the organisation, or that statesi of the art
technology will deliver excellent products which should then
take care of things for the organisation?
So why is it that management perts proclaim that employees
form the vital resource which ganisations must attract,
nurture and retain (this is not to be con fused with the
problems associated with a.tight labour market)?
Are not people an appendage of the production process the
extension of mechanical levers and optical scanners on the
factory floor? Were we not once using people like extensions
of machines when our economy was less developed in the 70s?
Now that the economy has become more sophisticated, the
manufacturing sector, principally, still employs people as
mindless workers (often the service sector is guilty of the
same). To a great extent, this seems to be the way in
manufacturing, even though it may not. be a preferred choice,
and it will continue to be so as long as the industry remains
duplicative in nature.
In crossing over to innovative manufacturing, employees will
have to be hired for their brains. The product improvement and
control over quality will have to originate from the assembly
line itself.
The company that makes mousetraps can no longer continue to
use the same method. It will now have to make "smart
mousetraps" through clever ideas.
Value will have to be added to the product. It has to be
versatile, more user friendly, more powerful has good service
back-up, and a lot cheaper.
Entrepreneurs will be forced to rethink whether escalating
costs are the result of inefficiency or true value addition to
product.
Consider the video cassette recorder or the personal computer.
These are essentially hardware produced by the company's
software quality and knowledgeable employees.
We are at a stage where we have to employ people who are going
to contribute their brain power.
In the past, organisations wanted to hire people with brains
but might not necessarily want them to use their brains. The
preferred culture of many organisations was "compliance with
rules over innovative work solutions." Employees were simply
required to follow procedures.
When the authorities wanted to implement the use of the third
like light on vehicles, the government department that was
entrusted to implement this policy could only come out with a
set of rules requiring the light to be of a certain dimension
and placed a number of centimetres here and there.
All that was very neat on paper but nonsensical in practice.
Ministerial intervention finally resolved the issue. Needless
to say, a number of bureaucratic organisations today, be they
in the public or pri faithfulness of their employees to follow
archaic rules, no matter what.
Perhaps this came about because of the unquestioned acceptance
of Fayol's concept of what the management process should be.
Control is essential and is the finality, and that used to be
conventional management wisdom (or still is?).
But excessive control in many organisations the kind that we
often encounter is counter productive and in substance
acknowledges the organisation's failure in hiring capable
people. When this happens, you want to trust your rules better
than your people.
Centralised authority constricts the organisation's ability to
respond effectively to change. But decentralised authority is
not equated with evaporating authority as many feared. Still,
the better you are able to follow rules in a bureaucratic
environment, the better you are thought to be and hence will
be appraised according to that anachronistic perception by
your superiors.
An organisation has to get its recruitment and selection
process right in order to hire the right sort of people.
Getting the right people first is certainly better than
getting your people right.
Where there is overcentralisation of employee hiring for all
departments, decentralised hiring which would be more
appropriate at addressing human resource specifics in large
organisations would be a better choice in lifting quality.
The criteria for recruitment and selection will have to be
refocused, and departure from overused ideas years of
experience, reward orientation and past performance is
inevitable.
This is because the old criteria focuses on the person's past
and short term needs. Organisations will have to adopt a new
set of criteria centred on employee learning, potential and
performance motivation. When that is done, employees will now
be considered soft assets that will manage and optimise the
use of hard assets of the company to good effect.
Down the road, the traditional accounting system will have to
be rewritten to show what kind of soft assets the organisation
truly has in its balance sheet.
|