>> MIM Speaks
MOST OF US LOOK BUT DON'T SEE
DEC 15, 1996 -
THE STAR
By Ng Ai Lin
THANK you for the article "Companies have a social role, too"
by Hadi Abdullah (Sunday Star, Nov 17).
As a Malaysian, I should be more than thrilled to witness our
country's exciting and accelerated economic growth. In the
education scene, Malaysians should be exhilarated that, with
new and liberal policies, more and more young people are given
opportunities to pursue their dreams of higher education.
But amid the extraordinary eco nomic boom and the sense of
excitement of our new achievement, we seem to be
"intoxicated". Many of us do not seem to notice the serious
social decay, the numerous environmental hazards and dire
health problems that have set in.
We should be grateful that most of our newspapers are making
an effort to highlight some of the ugly sights and
consequences of the fast pace of development. But how many of
us really see? What can we do about these problems that are
staring us in the face?
Why can't we see? Why can't we the people, solve the problems
more effectively? I believe the answer lies in education.
This country is in a hurry to fulfil our dreams, to achieve
what more progressive nations have attained. We are in a
hurry for fear of being left behind.
We need to meet our human resources requirement to boost our
vibrant economic growth. And so, we build more colleges, we
fill more institutions, we make more promises to attract the
young to come forward and fill the places that have been
created. The result is a boom in our education industry.
Some educationsts may take offence to the term "education
industry" but they should not. It is what it is. Education is
a social process and we live in an industrial society.
There is no denying that there is money to be made in
education. Broadly, education has to do with bringing about
ethical and intellectual changes in people, while industrial
processes bring about material changes in things.
However, in today's context, education can be perceived as a
service that caters to the needs of the people and since
"nothing is free" the needs are met at a price.
What, then, is the price?
Education is expensive business. The expenditure involved in
setting up an institution is high, considering equipment,
staffing and other running costs. Further expenditure is
incurred in aggressive advertising that is needed to bring
awareness as well as to bring in customers in this competitive
industry.
Once education was supported by philanthropists. Now, big
businessmen are actively involved. While the motives or
intentions of the first group were clear, it would be
enlightening to know the true motives of the second.
If the intentions are to "give back to society what one takes
from it" with the aim of making Malaysia a better place for
future generations they should be applauded.
Whatever the reasons, the consequences of running education as
an industry are far reaching due to the fact that it is
directed at thousands upon thousands of our youths who are our
future.
Do the businessmen involved in education realise the magnitude
and weight of their social responsibility to the public, by
virtue of the size and importance of the industry?
Are students getting good value for money? Are the students'
potential in completing the courses fully identified before
they are encouraged to enrol?
Are the lecturers qualified? Are there sufficient lecturers to
ensure the high quality of teaching that has been claimed
through the advertisements?
In short, are the businessmen keeping their promises?
To do so, they must aware of what education is. As the forces
behind the drive towards being an industrial nation are
political, economic and social, there is nothing less than an
education explosion in this country. As aspirations and
expectations rapidly increase, the standards of attainment and
proficiency are becoming more exacting on every aspect of
life. The main problem is to teach as much as possible to as
many as possible with our limited number of qualified
lecturers.
The inevitable is focussing on immediate needs and forgetting
the aims of general education, which have been vague despite
the Government's constant reminders of their importance.
In many cases, what students are taught are skills specific
responses to identifiable situations. They are taught
programming in computer classes, how to write reports as
required in their future positions, and they are taught how to
answer questions that will be asked in their professional
examinations.
In many cases, the quality of the language used is downplayed
or simply ignored. "We're only looking for the points of
knowledge," quipped a tired lecturer.
If this be the case, then education is nothing more than
training. And if education is nothing more than training, then
what is being churned out from educational institutions are
merely "human operators."
Imagine a nation of human operators. Imagine a nation operated
by human machines. Machines can't see. Operators do not
require to think much. Machines don't have souls.
Where then do we place the human values and the ingredient of
the soul while churning out human resources to meet the
nation's immediate physical and materialistic needs?
Are our colleges catering to the ethical and moral issues
which are part and parcel of the success of our social
framework?
Courses that "sell" are business studies, computer studies,
econom ics, engineering, marketing, archi tecture,
communications and ad vertising. Where are the courses on
history, literature, geography, phi losophy, psychology,
political sci ence and languages?
These are the disciplines that, sad to say, are perceived as
"non lucrative" to individuals, but these are the studies that
have real mean ing in the quality of our lives.
Should we rush through our edu cation at such lightning speed
and forget that we are human beings?
With the much publicised short programmes to attain
"profession alism," will students gain enough from their
studies to be able to claim that they have been educat ed? Can
we really claim that we are heading towards excellence in
education?
Our government is aware of the outcome of a soul less nation.
It is constantly pounding on the importance of achieving
"social justice, quality of life and political stability, with
positive social and spiritual values" through the inculcation
of strong moral, ethical, cultural and spiritual
understanding.
Some of these have been taught in schools, but is there
sufficient depth in their understanding to equip our young to
forge ahead and carry the nation into the next century?
There is much doubt judging from the avoidable and unfortunate
incidents that are happening around us.
It would be prudent for all of us of to slow down and take
stock of what's happening, get over our "hang over" and wonder
if what we are doing to ourselves and our y future is worth
all the hurry.
It would be worthwhile for the s businesses in education to
create the need for studies in the humanities for, after
all, business today is d about creating and marketing prod
ucts, not just meeting the needs as e it was once perceived to
do.
This would then enable business es to, directly and
indirectly, fulfil a good part of their social responsibility,
to educate people who can In see beyond ringgit and sen.
If more of us realise that the than wealth of living is in the
giving and being the wisdom of life comes from true knowledge,
perhaps then we can see the serious social problems, the
environmental disasters and the imminent threats to our health
and do something before it is too late.
|