>> MIM Speaks
GOOD MANAGERS MUST UNDERSTAND HUMAN NATURE
SEPT 01, 1996 -
NEW STRAITS TIMES
IN the 1950s, a management scientist of the behavioural
school, Douglas McGregor, observed that American companies
practiced what he called the Theory X approach to management.
This approach is still commonly used today in the US and in
Malaysia. At least 80 per cent of Malaysian companies use thls
approach.
Theory X assumes that people generally dislike work. They try
to avoid work by giving all sorts of excuses. In order to get
work done, managers must push them and keep an eye on them.
We are all familiar with this notion. In fact, we even joke
about it, hence the saying 'when the cat is away, the mice
will play'. It is still common to see grandmothers perched on
stools watching the maids do the laundry to ensure the clothes
are rinsed properly in clean water.
Directly opposite is Theory Y, under which McGregor postulates
that certain people love work and willingly put in their best
effort. They enjoy working and seek more challenging and
responsible assignments.
In many ways, the way a manager treats his subordinates is
largely due to which theory he subscribes to.
If he believes in Theory X, he tends to adopt a autocratic
leadership style to get work done. If he is a believer of
Theory Y. he would tend to be less autocratic and more
supportive of the workers.
More often than not, Malaysian managers choose the autocratic
leadership style. They see it as the traditional way and that
workers expect to be treated strictly from the top.
If you treat them kindly, they will take advantage of you as
your humane approach is perceived as a sign of weakness. This
is sad but some Malaysian workers fall into this category.
Theory Y managers push their workers after they realise that
the soft approach does not work. Much effort is put into
educating employees to be responsible. It will take hard work
and time but the rewards are worthwhile.
Not all managers are Theory X or Y practitioners. Some are
Perceptive enough to be, what professor William Ouchi of the
University of California calls, Theory Z practitioners.
These managers believe that employees work best when treated
with respect as individuals. While they realise that company
objectives have to be achieved, they understand human nature
and use this understanding to exercise their power.
They try to establish mutual trust and a cordial boss-staff
relationship.
We are not talking about managers who only give lip service to
this. This is common but the not so common true Theory Z
practitioners really practise the `firm but fair' approach.
Employees know that good performance will be praised and a
poor performance the opposite.
WHICH IS THE BEST WAY?
IS there a best way? The answer is obviously no. Humans and
their behav iour are simply too com plex and unpredictable for
that.
In the field of motivational research, in addition to Theories
X, Y and Z. there are also Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
Theory and Frederick Herzberg's Two Factor Theory.
In the latter theory, there are motivators like recognition,
praise and sense of achievement as well as de-motivators like
poor working conditions and poor company policies.
Maslow's theory sets out five levels of needs in humans:
* physiological, ie food, water, shelter and sex * safety
needs, ie to feel safe and secure * belonging, ie to belong to
an organised group * Ego or esteem, ie to feel important or a
sense of self-worth * Self-actualisation, ie the realisation
of one's potential
Good managers and leaders have to learn to be sensitive and
understanding. There is no one particular approach which will
automatically result in a highly motivated or energised
workforce.
Each employee is unique with different strengths and
limitations. Though there are certain ways which individuals
tend to behave, perceptive managers learn to deal with those
nearest to them on a case-by-case basis.
Human motivation is the most difficult challenge to manage.
Managers have little choice but to equip themselves with the
knowledge, skills and attitudes that will bring forth the best
efforts from their subordinates.
A common managerial style in the corporate world is the one
which orders people around.
Many large corporations in Malaysia have egoistic managers who
think that their position allows them to treat their
subordinates like dirt. Such managers had licked the boots of
their superiors on their way up and when they reach the top,
expect their boots to be licked as well.
WHAT MOTIVATES PEOPLE AT WORK?
INDIVIDUALS are motivated or de-motivated by different factors
in a work environment. Emotions such as fear, desire for money
or power, and psychological need to belong can affect
motivation.
For instance, when the basic and monetary needs are met, the
desire for security, status or self-actualisation become more
prominent.
On the other hand, a worker from a humble background would
remain silent when reprimanded but one with a pampered
upbringing will react emotionally and may even storm out of
the room when a superior takes him to task.
Good managers must have an indepth understanding of human
nature. Traits or qualities which help in better managerial
style include:
* patience as dealing with people takes much time.
* humility. In a rapidly changing world, humility enables us
to constantly improve our skills and increase our knowledge.
* thoughtfulness. The lack of it is probably responsible for
most of the organisation's problems.
* trust. Without trust, a superior cannot delegate work to his
subordinates.
* empathy. A superior needs to be mindful and sensitive to his
employees' capabilities, shortcomings and aspirations.
* firmness. There are times where a manager has to be very
firm and unwavering. As long as he is fair and his intentions
are good, his subordinates will learn to respect him.
|