>> MIM Speaks
ARCHETYPES OF THE MALAYSIAN MANAGER
JAN 07, 1996 -
THE STAR
By Azhari Karim
ONE of the concerns of Malaysian management today is to define
the ideals for managers. Against these ideals we can then
measure how successful our managers have been in managing the
changes they face in their enterprises.
These ideals, however, can only be understood if we put them
in the context of the development of man in the whole
management process that has evolved through the ages.
It has been observed that man has been trying to pit himself
against all living and nonliving things, machines included.
This is to say that man should always place himself above all
created things since it has always been believed that man is
the noblest of all God's creations.
There is thus a natural progression in the way that man has
managed himself on Earth. In the days of early man, we learned
to survive by our wits and strength. We foraged for food and
fought for our space.
The Stone Age gave way to the Iron Age and man was able to add
simple technology to assist him in life. Religion, culture and
leisure followed to give man meaning to his life.
The earliest concept of the "management man" could be defined
in terms of how much of his mind and body was used to help him
survive. To the Greeks and the man's triumphs against all
odds were ses became the ancient archetypes for man until the
flowering of Renaissance and English tenment thinking brought
man face to face with machines.
From the status of the Noble Savage as defined by Rousseau,
man acquired the graces of the Renaissance Man as created by
Diderot. We were then catapulted through the centuries as a
result of the ensuing Industrial Age to become the Economic
Man.
For once we were given the right of free choice. Our superior
intellect gave us the extra abilities to control nature and
the world with the machines that we were able to fashion.
Management Man became a factor of the production process.
This growth later contributed to a golden age of scientific
discoveries, global commerce and industrialisation. Man's
mastery of the universe enabled us to overcome the mysteries
of physics and pushed us to land a man on the moon.
The philosophies of the Economic Man carried civilisation to
all parts of the world. Colonies and empires grew. The
management of relations between countries became like a chess
game with zero sum outcomes.
Ideologies divided the world between the West and the East and
between the haves and the have-nots. As a consequence,
Economic Man became exploitative and, moved by greed and envy,
turned the world into theatres of conflicts which resulted in
suffering and destruction. What man made they could easily
destroy.
When good sense prevailed, the interest of management then was
to improve man's lot. The age of the Economic Man came to pass
and it was substituted by the age of the Organisation Man.
Known also as the Corporate Man, the essential traits of this
character are the ability to organise the factors of
production to better serve the new business organisations. Big
business became the craze of the day.
Among its symbol was the man in the grey-flannel suit and
pin-striped trousers. It was fashionable to be seen also with
an umbrella and even a copy of The Times under the arm.
Across the Atlantic, the business club seemed to decide the
style of life for these people.
A whole new lifestyle was observed by the Corporate Man. They
have been called Yuppies and Urbanites by others. Their
influence was worldwide. With the mush-rooming of
multinationals, the Organisation Man became dominant in most
countries, including Malaysia, for some time.
There was one distinct difference, though. Whenever Malaysians
took on senior posi tions in these companies, their modes of
behaviour were very much like the people they replaced. They
began to ape the lifestyles of the expatriates.
Gradually, the Organisation Man in Malaysia came into his own.
As the economy flourished and business began to grow, more and
more of them started to become conscious of their roots.
They began to imbibe the teachings of the classics from China
and Japan. Sun Tzu and the ways of Zen were seriously studied
for inspiration and guidance in their business dealings. The
management theories of the West were tempered with the softer
readings from the Eastern examples of business success. The
Japannese and the Korean models became the new standard of
efficiency and achievement.
There was a conscious effort to go on their own in many
things. Their work culture and lifestyles hardly resemble
those of the Organisation or Corporate Man that we find in the
West.
The Asian version of the Organisation Man is not the
stereotype that we know of. He is more interested in the
success of the companies that he is working with.
As observed by Hamzah Sendut, John Madsen and Gregory Thong in
their book, Managing In A Plural Society (published by MIM),
culture became the basis of the behaviour patterns among
managers in the region.
NEW MANAGERIAL TYPE EVOLVING
The elements that decide their distinctiveness are those of
religion and moral values, a strong sense of cultural identity
and community, a strong group spirit that drives all
collective decisions, and the common desire to maintain
harmony within the group.
Among the Malays, it was noticed that there was a growing
feeling to relate their business practices to the universal
Islamic ideals as contained in the Quran and the Hadith. This
coin cided with the Governments moves to instil islamic values
in the public and private sectors.
Most Islamic precepts of doing business have been introduced
in the country as an alter native to the -Western forms which
sometimes have been thought to be at variance with the tenets
of Islam and other universal principles. Slowly and surely,
there is a conscious effort to evolve a new archetype of
Management Man.
The Universe Man was thus created out of the heed to be more
relevant to the times. The main characteristic is the ability
to lead the change to a better future as envisioned in vision
2020.
The environment is defined as follows:
* Competition on a global scale.
* Demand for better products and services.
* Continuous drive for efficiency and effectiveness.
* Enhanced leadership focus on visibility and communication,
sense of mission, quality and the needs of customers.
In management terms, the age of the Universal Man will see a
greater movement of managers and executives across traditional
borders. Business will flourish away from one's-national
boundaries where these managers must become adept at managing
the changes to be found in these distant countries. For the
Malaysian managers, we would have to strengthen our mental and
spiritual faculties.
One crucial test for the Universal Man will be the changes
brought about by globalisation. The technological dynamism
that will emerge from the process will demand the correct
strategy among our managers. Among the new skills would be
that of managing the new technology and IT competency. On top
of this is a requirement for networking in research and
development.
The challenge for the Malaysian manager in the coming years is
how he will measure up to the ideals of the Universal Man. The
other archetypes are no longer applicable to him in these
changing times. Of significance to him is participation in the
process to transform himself to the changing needs of business
and its environment.
At the same time, business interests must converge with those
of the Government's, otherwise our nation may face
difficulties in our quest for developed nation status by the
year 2020. At best, our success will become a novel
contribution to the theory of management in the 2Ist century.
|