>> MIM Speaks
EVOLING OUR OWN STYLE FOR SUCCESS
SEPT 10, 1995 -
THE STAR
THE debate to evolve a Malaysian management identity has
begun. In his speech at a gathering of entrepreneurs last
month, Entrepreneur Development Minister Datuk Mustapha
Mohamed urged those present to cultivate a Malaysian
management culture. The need for our own management style has
been created, according to the minister, by the country's
growing role in the global economy. It was also thought that a
distinct Malaysian style which he said could be drawn from the
various sources Western Japanese and taking the best from
Islamic values could hold the key to the country continued
success.
To contribute to this on going debate in a positive way, the
Malaysian Institute of Management has started bringing people
together to talk about it. Further efforts will be carried out
in a proposed colloquium to be held in early November where
the best management minds in the country will deliberate on
the topic. It is expected that the colloquium will pave the
way for evolving a Malaysian management ethos. In general,
however, giving shape to this set of beliefs in Malaysian
management will involve making initial decisions on such
questions as which part of the management spectrum are we
looking at, what will form the bases of this core of beliefs,
and since Malaysia is a multi cultural multi ethnic and multi
religions country, which of the three main cultures are we
talking about when we refer to a Malaysian style of
management. Will there be a need to find a common denominator
first in the various strands of management styles prevalent in
the country? What follows is an attempt to clarify some of the
issues raised.
Management as we understand it, has gone full circle. In the
early days, it used to be concerned with the organisation of
huge numbers of People to do certain things. The results
could be seen in the Seven Wonders of the World which could
not have been built without proper and efficient handling of
the people engaged in the projects. But things changed during
the war years. The need to rush supplies to the fronts
prompted people to think of mass production. Instead of
people, the product became the most important consideration.
Ingenious ways were found to transport these large quantities
of weapons and armaments across land borders and seas.
Product management grew in importance as a result. People
began to get used to seeing more of the same things. The
Germans brought out the Beetle and Ford invented the assembly
line. The Americans finally came out with the ultimate
product, the bomb, to try and end the war in their favor. When
peace prevailed, the human mind became more relaxed and
started to look at the processes of managing their lives.
Thinking about the processes became the rage in management
theorising then. It was popularised by the Japanese.
WE are familiar, for example, just in time and zero Japanese
started a revolution in major processes in the line and
reorganised management to suit the new mands Present versions
of this concern for processes are to be found in such
movements for restructuring re invention and re engineering.
Today, howev er, we are once again concerned with people hist
like OUFi forefathers. We are looking at ways to motivate
people, get them to work as teams and obtain a partnership
commitment from them. Partly, the shift has occurred because
of the changing paradigms in managing the world of work today.
The basic assumptions of the workforce, the workplace and work
relationships have to be redefined. The thinking was provided
by Stephen Covey, for instance. He would like us to strip away
the Isyers of conditioning that we have aLlowed ourselves to
endure all these years.
He feels we could be free to choose and apply our human
endowments of self awareness, imagination, conscience and
independent will in all our undertakings. Therefore, under the
emerging paradigms, the inner experiences of individuals
including intuition, emotions, creativity and spirit are
certainly n ore important.
The people factor will become more significant for Malaysians
as we move into the 21st century and start to steer ourselves
towards achieving Vision 2020. A new relevance must be found
for getting people to be trained with the skills needed for
the coming century. With an eye on defining the Malaysian
managemerit identity, we could consider the people factor as a
starting point. Because of the multi racial and multi cultural
background of our people Malaysians will find it much the new
demands of the chance . We are also sensitive and aware of the
problems and difficulties king in a multicultural setting. As
a result we are of course ready to take on the challenges of
the globalisation of our economy.
Owing to this special quality that we Malaysians have, we are
much sought after to manage the multinational companies in the
region. We must therefore use this strength and make it the
hallmark of our management style. Another aspect of our
strength that could pass as one other characteristic of the
management identity that is essentially recognisable as being
truly Malaysian is the ability to take on work on the basis of
teams. We are familiar with the national habit of gotong
royong. Malaysians would not hesitate to do their bit for
society given the right atmosphere. Witness the celebrations
that were organised for every special occasion. The art of
berkampong, berkhatan, berkorban is practised even in the
urban areas.
Team work is, therefore, nothing new to Malaysians. It is one
of the important elements of the Malaysian management
identity. We could also try to place the practice of reaching
decisions by consensus as a further element in our style of
management. This is being used widely at all levels of the
leadership. In many ways it represents the practice which is
commonly found in our neighbouring countries like Indonesia
and Thailand. It is known also as mushawarah and muafakat.
This art of decision making is as old as our civilisation
having been applied even during the of the Sultanate of
Malacca. It is now a powerful tool in the decision making
process of Asean. Every single step is decided based on this
principle of consensus. Asean has proven that it is a secret
of the success of the organisation all these years.
There are other areas that need to be considered when we wish
to define the Malaysian management identity. If we place our
Malaysian cultural tradition within the context of the larger
Asian cultural traditions, we will come across such things as
family values kinship, the role of the father and tie fear of
losing face which could be included into this definition of
the identity. This short expose of some of the areas that will
concern people when they talk about the Malaysian management
identity, will further contribute towards making the task
easier for those attempting to define it.
|