>> MIM Speaks
WEAVING THE CLOTH OF INTEGRATION
MAY 7, 1995 -
THE STAR
BY all accounts, the seminar on lslam-Confucianism:
Civilisational Dialogue held at Universiti Malaya March 13-14,
was a big success.
I had the good fortune to sit on the organising committee and
was able to involve myself with all aspects of the seminar.
Never have I seen so much enthusiasm shown by
paper-presenters, participants and organisers. We were gearing
ourselves up for a huge turnout. As it turned out, there were
more than enough participants.
Generally, I found the gathering united in the pursuit of
intellectual excellence and to satisfy their thirst for
knowledge. I could not agree more with the Deputy Prime
Minister who, when opening the seminar, likened the event to
an intellectual "Bandung . "
If Bandung in 1955 could be as a beacon of hope for an
Afro-Asian political renaissance, then this first-ever
Islam-Confucianism Civilisational Dialogue must be ranked as
the culmination point for an Asian intellectual renaissance.
But many local commentators chose to ignore this lofty saying
by the Deputy Prime Minister, thereby belittling the good
intentions and sincere efforts put in by the organisers.
What follows are some of my personal observations on the
seminar as a whole. I would like to focus on the question I
posed at the beginning of the paper "What comes after the
Dialogue?" I wish to add a rejoinder-how do we get there?
Let us begin with what Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said in his
opening address, that the dialogue would greatly contribute
towards global peace and understanding. What is significant
here is that he has placed the sense of his remark in the
context of Malaysia as well as that of Asia.
In the Malaysian context, he had in mind that the tolerance
and understanding that existed between the different races,
especially among the Malays and the Chinese who are
"Confucianists" in some ways, had contributed to our national
development.
- He had also listed the areas of collaboration that had
really brought the two civilisations together: competitive
business, democratic politics, grassroots organisations,
scientific research and many other areas of endeavour.
In moving on to the wider context of Asia, he mentioned that
this exercise at fusing culture and economics could be the
basis of building a more united East Asia, to be founded on
"competitive industrialisation" and "democratic political
community. "
Such is the strain of the argument that comes out of the
dialogue. The paper presenters later were to pick up on this
idea.
It is as if they were colouring their fabric by first applying
the fundamental colours that shaped the Malaysian fabric and
go from there to a consideration of the broader and more
multivaried colours that are present in South-East Asia. The
process towards a cultural integration is not impossible given
the fact that such a dialogue mechanism had been put in place
for some time.
There were two other presentations during the seminar that
evoked what Anwar had said. I am referring to the ideas
discussed by Associate Prof Cheng Gek Nai of the Department of
Chinese Studies Universiti Malaya.
In the case of the Malaysian experience, she said the
civilisational dialogue process should be pursued to attain an
acceptable national ethics. This bears some further discussion
as the idea of building an ethical nation has been inscribed
in the 2020 Vision.
Going beyond geographical constraints, she extended her vision
to apply the process to solve global. problems and build an
ethical global society. For a start, she called for the
setting up of a National Institute for Ethics to help in
strategising "mankind's development" in the 21st Century.
In the same vein, Dr Chandra Muzaffar, Senior Research Fellow,
Universiti Sains Malaysia, said the Civilisational Dialogue if
properly developed could help bring about national unity.
He identified two ways of doing this: first, we would need to
list out what are the common values in all the traditions and
religions-Islam Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Sikhism and
Taoism. Second, is to come out with a core of universal
spiritual and moral values. Included in this are such values
as kindness, courtesy, justice and unity.
All of the suggestions and ideas stated above were later to be
integrated in a much bigger idea at the end of the seminar.
Again it was Anwar who called for the setting up of an East
Asian Studies Institute at Universiti Malaya to begin serious
work on studying the various cultures and traditions in their
proper context.
The idea was well-received by the Malaysian public. It was
also echoed by the Vice-Chancellor of Universiti Malaya who
said that the establishment of such a centre could be done
almost immediately.
Universiti Malaya is, I believe, the ideal place. It is not
only the oldest and the premier university in the country but
also it already has existing units or centres such as the
Chinese Studies Department, the South-East Asian Studies
Department and others that can easily be incorporated into the
new Institute.
It could also consider setting up a Centre for Regional
Studies which could be upgraded to a faculty.
In line with its planning to corporatise itself, the
university will have the opportunity to openly recruit the
best and the brightest from home and abroad. It will also not
face constraints in terms of finance and other organisational
matters.
I wish Universiti Malaya all the success. Carry on with the
dialogues. It is only Asian to try and keep the doors open
through dialogues and consensus.
|