>> MIM Speaks
A BUDGET TO FULFIL VISION 2020
NOV 6, 1994 -
THE STAR
THE annual national budget is designed, first, to achieve the
economic and social objectives set for the next year and
second, to structure the fiscal instruments and financial
allocations to achieve the goals.
It is officially announced by the Finance Minister at a
parliamentary session traditionally scheduled for the last
Friday of every October. The 1995 Budget proposals were
unveiled on Oct 28 this year.
An annual budgetary exercise is a common management practice
to review, take stock and decide for the future.
At the enterprise level, corporations and organisations map
out the expectations for the next fiscal year and develop a
financial budget which, upon approval, becomes the operating
document to guide subsequent action.
It provides the parameters for organisational planning,
implementation and control.
Public reception to the 1995 Budget has been overwhelmingly
favourable and many voices have suggested that this is the
"best budget" to date.
The common perception among Malaysians is that a good budget
is equated to any reduction or abolition of direct and
indirect taxes. On these counts, the Budget has delivered the
goodies-reduction of the income tax rate for individuals and
enterprises, and the lowering and removal of import duties and
excise taxes on a host of goods. The loss to revenue from
these cutbacks is estimated at RM2 billion.
Of greater significance is the articulated national direction
for the next year. After all, revenue is raised to finance
expenditure that will serve specific goals.
In this respect, the 1995 Budget is very clear. It is
strategically crafted to achieve four principal objectives: to
sustain strong economic growth, to reduce inflation, to
develop skilled manpower and to build a progressive and
balanced society.
These are the issues that should dominate public discussion,
which should not focus just on fiscal measures to raise
revenue and who benefits most from the exercise.
Fiscal measures are structured to encourage personal and
corporate initiatives and action in the context of national
objectives.
Our attempt to introduce a payroll tax long ago and the poll
tax legislation introduced recently in the UK looked at
revenue collection ahead of the objectives these measures were
intended to serve.
Consequently, they generated considerable resistance and
noncompliance which led to the eventual scrapping of the
proposals.
Attempts to introduce new tax initiatives will normally
attract considerable public comment, particularly from those
who are directly affected.
For the 1995 Budget, no new tax proposals have been made; the
existing tax mechanisms have been fine-tuned to encourage
investments, reduce intention and to build a more wholesome
society. None of the tuning is designed to discourage action
and no one is particularly "hurt" by the Budget.
The objective of the 1995 Budget relate to the key concerns of
our national development. As a nation, we need to be more
competitive to attract investments.
We are no longer a low-production-cost facility and low
corporate income tax rates have to be the substitute to
attract investments.
Accordingly, the reduction of the corporate income tax rate to
30 per cent should help strengthen our capacity to continue
and sustain our relatively-high economic growth.
The abolition of income tax on remittances by Malaysian
companies operating overseas also reinforces the potential of
reinvestments in Malaysia.
The second national concern is that our economic prosperity is
not nullified by inflation. In many developing countries,
notably in South America, three-digit inflation creates
considerable currency instability and real income is
proportionately diminished.
Nearer home, the incredible two digit economic growth taking
place in China is now accompanied by rising inflation.
Our own inflation rate at around four per cent is modest by
comparison, but with rapid economic growth, prices of goods
and services will be under siege.
All it takes is for one item in a chain to suffer a shortage
(real or engineered) and a spiralling effect will be set in
motion.
Our political leadership has proclaimed a war on inflation and
the chicken price issue is a case in point.
The removal and reduction of import duties on some 2,600 items
of foodstuff and consumable goods will increase supply and
stabilise price.
In the longer term, this fiscal action should also help
strengthen our own productive capacity to be more competitive
and less dependent on government protection.
For a relatively small nation, our ranking at No. 17 for
competitiveness and at No. 19 as a trading nation is good, but
the drive to be a net exporter rather than a net importer is a
critical step in achieving a more durable economic foundation
for the nation.
We are a caring and progressive society. The challenges of
Vision 2020 serves to ensure that Malaysian society will be
more humane towards the less fortunate and that there is equal
opportunity to knowledge for all.
The fiscal mechanisms have recognised this as more tax relief
are given to the disabled and libraries are encouraged to be
set up by tax exempt donations of individuals and
corporations.
A wholesome society has a place for the arts, and the music
industry, in particular, is a beneficiary with the reduction
of import duty on pianos, and tax exemptions on studio
equipment and accessories should encourage the development of
musical talent.
Perhaps the most significant contribution of the 1995 Budget
is the unequalled emphasis and priority accorded to human
resource development.
A country can draw on two categories of resources that can
contribute to economic prosperity.
Many developing countries have concentrated far too long on
exploiting natural resources.
The prosperous newly industrialised economies, with little
natural resource, focused instead on developing the competence
and potential of human effort.
The success stories of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong
and Singapore have clearly shown that human resource
development does pay.
Vision 2020 seeks to develop a technological society and we
are very conscious that the only real limit to fulfilment is
the human resource development gap.
Compared with the NIEs, our commitment to studies in science,
mathematics and industrial and vocational disciplines is
relatively on the low side.
The budget allocation of RM10.031 billion or 20.6 per cent of
allocations is the highest ever for education and training,
and much of the new funds is expected to flow into
vocationally-oriented programmes.
As the euphoria of a good budget fades the hard work of
pursuing our national objectives of growth without rising
inflation, human resource development, and a caring and
progressive society has to continue unabated.
The 1995 Budget is only a management tool, man-made but with a
clarity of purpose. It should help the nation take another
confident step towards fulfilling the challenge of Vision
2020.
|