>> MIM Speaks
A SEARCH FOR LOCAL MANAGEMENT ETHOS
OCT 23, 1994 -
THE STAR
FOR a young and small nation we have done remarkably well.
Many critical commentators have made the observation that we
are blessed with good natural resources. They are right, but
only up to a point.
Throughout the beginning and the major portion of this
century, our economic and social life revolved around rubber,
oil palm and tin. Kuala Lumpur was born out of nature's
abundance of tin and many of our major towns began as centres
for mineral extraction and agricultural development.
The management challenge was to extract as much as possible
from Mother Nature in the shortest possible time. It was the
first phase of management for this country. The job of
management was easy and quite comfortable with stengahs for
lunch and happy hours to follow.
The excitement then was the Emergency of the communist
insurgency or the occasional strike due to industrial unrest.
For the individual manager, routine quickly set in and he
became, in essence, only a factor of production.
Much more exciting was the life of the entrepreneur, the
people with vision who chased their dreams. Such dreams have
created the Sime Darby, the Guthries, the Golden Hope, the
MMC, and the many well-known public companies of today.
Even for the entrepreneur of yesterday, things could be taken
at a measured pace. you start with one estate, then acquire
another, and you grow and evolve. It has-taken several
generations to nurse and continue with the dream of the
founder.
How different it is with entrepreneurship and with management
these days in which time, complexity, and instruments are so
vastly changed and fortunes can be made or lost overnight.
Gone are the days of evolutionary change; we are now
confronted with the phenomena of takeovers, mergers and
acquisitions, management buyouts, swaps, options, derivatives,
and a-host of few mechanisms to squeeze time and Maximise
opportunities.
The second wave of management began when we achieved
statehood. As an independent nation we had to develop our own
managers to look after the twin pillars of our economy, rubber
and tin, and a rapidly-growing manufacturing sector.
We also had to manage to the public service, including
statutory bodies and the armed forces. As a young nation with
abundant natural resources, the concern then was to ensure
that we had the human resource talent to marshall our
resources to provide a higher standard of living for our
population.
The concern for economic growth was expressed in our national
planning documents-the First, Second and subsequent Malayan
and Malaysian Five-Year Plans. A convenient and understandably
acceptable paradigm was the Western model of management and
its focus on the hard aspects of production, marketing and
finance.
It was a technology that worked as demonstrated by the state
of development and economic dominance of the United States and
Western Europe.
And Malaysians bought the technology of a manager whose
primary role is to increase shareholders' wealth and whose
tools were returns on investment and profit maximisation. It
is a technology that is easy to quantify and measure. But it
also suggests that the ends justify the means.
When we introduced the Western model of management into our
organisations, we unconsciously introduced Western norms of
behaviour into our operating systems. We assume, somewhat
incorrectly, that the Malaysian manager is only concerned with
maximising shareholders' wealth and that he perceives his
total performance in terms of turnover and net profit.
Born into a tradition of a social rather than the individual
person, the Malaysian traces his roots to the rich social
kaleidoscope of Asia and into the millennia of cultural
influences to shape the community-oriented person he has
become. For him, the means are equally important as the end
because he places value on relationships, reciprocity and
goodwill.
The Malaysian is a creature of social evolution, finely
crafted and finely tuned to be sensitive to the aspirations
and the needs of others. It is generally not in his character
to seek self-aggrandisement at the expense of others. But the
best in us is now under seige.
With increasing globalisation and contact with other cultures
through the mass media and direct social interaction, we are
in danger of losing our cultural balance as we begin to copy
the behaviour of more materialistic societies. Our young in
particular are vulnerable and our leaders and managers have to
act to ensure that hedonistic pleasure is not the purpose of
life and that every individual can and must seek fulfilment
through contributions to the welfare and prosperity of the
larger community and the nation.
The Western management model, which worked for us in the past
because we ourselves neglected the nobler challenges of
nation-building in favour of pure economic prosperity, is no
longer adequate. In fact it is no longer adequate in managing
the Western world.
It is ironic that the success of the Western model of
development carries its own seeds of destruction as
self-interest produces corporate barbarians, material
well-being induces moral decay and laxity, and high living
standards yield an unwillingness to be bothered with the wider
concerns of society..
More and more Western authorities on management are seeking
inspiration from Eastern practices, persuaded in part by the
rapid emergence of the new crucible of development-Asia in
general and Asean in particular-and in part by the failure of
Western concepts of management.
The era of relaxed management that typifies the first half of
the century is now obsolete and the Western approach to
management, over much of the second half, is becoming
inadequate and even irrelevant to the demands for a vigorous,
progressive and united society that we want to forge over the
next generation.
We urgently need to fashion a new paradigm of management that
will couple the science of production with the art of humanity
to take us into the 21st Century and beyond.
In my view, the Malaysian manager of tomorrow has to fulfil
the following key roles:
COMMITMENT to his organisation and a belief in the nobility of
its purpose;
PROFESSIONAL application of his talents, competence and skills
to further the mission of his Organisation;
ABIDING concern and interest in contributing to the welfare
beyond self, to benefit all stakeholders-employees, customers,
suppliers, creditors and the community-besides shareholders;
LOVE for the nation and a consuming desire to protect the
values that bind our society and the relationships that keep
us in balance as Bangsa Malaysia.
Fulfilling these roles is not going to be easy. It will demand
from the manager a skilful blending of the best features of
Western management and, in particular, the use of the emerging
information superhighway together with the best of our
cultural heritage. It will require a fusion of hard
professional management with soft humanity to develop a new
genre of the Malaysian manager in the mould of the Renaissance
Man, supported by technology but guided by culture and
tradition.
We have to seek out the identity of the Malaysian manager,
configurate his style and uniqueness and ultimately export him
into the international arena as our most precious resource.
We have been blessed with natural resources and for three
quarters of the century we have gained from the exploitation
of our physical wealth. But the real wealth of the future is
derived from Man's ingenuity in pushing the borders of science
and technology, in accumulating intellectual property and in
managing change, complexity and chaos.
I believe that we can master the newer contributions to
economic prosperity and that our management community can
respond to the challenge of our vision for a much better
tomorrow.
Economic and social prosperity is not the cause but the
consequence of good and effective management. We have had our
fair share of good managers. Our challenge for the future is
to handle the generational change that comes about from the
transformation of our economy and society.
|